| Revision as of 12:06, 3 May 2014 editCFynn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,396 editsm →3 May 2014← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:07, 3 May 2014 edit undoCFynn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,396 editsm →3 May 2014Next edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| On 2 May 2014 You wrote: '']: "Some news outlets host interactive columns '''they call blogs''', and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are '''professionals in the field''' on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control."'''' | On 2 May 2014 You wrote: '']: "Some news outlets host interactive columns '''they call blogs''', and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are '''professionals in the field''' on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control."'''' | ||
| Of course such sources are acceptable - but still not nearly as good as when the same person publishes a properly referenced article in a peer reviewed journal or book. The key is the peer review which means experts have checked it too. | Of course such sources are acceptable - but still not nearly as good as when the same person publishes a properly referenced article in a peer reviewed journal or book. The key is the "peer review" which means other experts have checked it too. | ||
| ] (]) | ] (]) | ||
| == == | == == | ||
| Hi Heicth, I tried to balance and added some templates to ]. This article is an utter mess. Please keep an eye on it that the campaigners don’t remove the templates and some of the corrections I added. I lack time to engage. ] (]) 09:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC) | Hi Heicth, I tried to balance and added some templates to ]. This article is an utter mess. Please keep an eye on it that the campaigners don’t remove the templates and some of the corrections I added. I lack time to engage. ] (]) 09:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:07, 3 May 2014
Heicth, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Heicth! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
the "ban" problem
Thank you for your note on Shugden controversy with respect to the term "ban". I changed parts of the article, adding Thurman, the Dalai Lama and CTA. For the abuse of the term ban see here: http://buddhism-controversy-blog.com/2014/03/07/the-western-shugden-groups-campaign-against-the-dalai-lamas-ban-of-shugden-worship/ Kt66 (talk) 12:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
DL article section
ok, thank you, I added my opinion. I am strict for WP:RS and the other WP rules. You can contact me also in the future in similar cases though I am rather absent than present in WP, I am willing to minor contributions. Kt66 (talk) 17:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Re: Your message
You asked "Is it proper for Truthsayer62 to insert a large amount of Shugden websites at Dorje Shugden Controversy?" Please see what I write in the talk page of the article. Chris Fynn (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
3 May 2014
On 2 May 2014 You wrote: WP:UGC: "Some news outlets host interactive columns they call blogs', and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control."'
Of course such sources are acceptable - but still not nearly as good as when the same person publishes a properly referenced article in a peer reviewed journal or book. The key is the "peer review" which means other experts have checked it too. Chris Fynn (talk)
Hi Heicth, I tried to balance and added some templates to Western Shugden Society. This article is an utter mess. Please keep an eye on it that the campaigners don’t remove the templates and some of the corrections I added. I lack time to engage. Kt66 (talk) 09:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Re: 14th Dali Lama
Please see my recent reply to your comment on the talk page of that article. You also may be interested in this. Chris Fynn (talk) 12:03, 3 May 2014 (UTC)