Revision as of 08:44, 22 March 2014 editTruthsayer62 (talk | contribs)622 edits Warning regarding the Dorje Shugden Controversy article← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:01, 22 March 2014 edit undoTruthsayer62 (talk | contribs)622 edits →Dorje Shugden ControversyNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Dorje Shugden Controversy == | == Dorje Shugden Controversy == | ||
As we discussed on the talk page of this article because you are unwilling to collaborate and prefer to protect the article rather than allow it to be constructively edited, I have no choice now but to report you. I've made numerous attempts to seek a constructive solution but you just keep rebuffing my efforts so now there is no other solution. ] (]) 08:44, 22 March 2014 (UTC) | As we discussed on the talk page of this article because you are unwilling to collaborate and prefer to protect the article rather than allow it to be constructively edited, I have no choice now but to report you. I've made numerous attempts to seek a constructive solution but you just keep rebuffing my efforts so now there is no other solution. ] (]) 08:44, 22 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. |
Revision as of 09:01, 22 March 2014
Heicth, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Heicth! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
the "ban" problem
Thank you for your note on Shugden controversy with respect to the term "ban". I changed parts of the article, adding Thurman, the Dalai Lama and CTA. For the abuse of the term ban see here: http://buddhism-controversy-blog.com/2014/03/07/the-western-shugden-groups-campaign-against-the-dalai-lamas-ban-of-shugden-worship/ Kt66 (talk) 12:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
DL article section
ok, thank you, I added my opinion. I am strict for WP:RS and the other WP rules. You can contact me also in the future in similar cases though I am rather absent than present in WP, I am willing to minor contributions. Kt66 (talk) 17:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Dorje Shugden Controversy
As we discussed on the talk page of this article because you are unwilling to collaborate and prefer to protect the article rather than allow it to be constructively edited, I have no choice now but to report you. I've made numerous attempts to seek a constructive solution but you just keep rebuffing my efforts so now there is no other solution. Truthsayer62 (talk) 08:44, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.