Revision as of 01:05, 8 February 2014 editMark Arsten (talk | contribs)131,188 edits Level 2 warning re. Dumb and Dumber (HG)← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:52, 2 March 2014 edit undoMeters (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers172,962 edits →top: edit warringNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==March 2014== | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
Please be particularly aware, ] states: | |||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. | |||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''{{Break}} Marking edits that are not being accepted by others as minor is not helping.<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 23:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== February 2014 == | == February 2014 == | ||
Revision as of 23:52, 2 March 2014
March 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Culture of Canada sidebar. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Marking edits that are not being accepted by others as minor is not helping. Meters (talk) 23:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Hello, I'm Newyorkadam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Dumb and Dumber, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Newyorkadam (talk) 23:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Dumb and Dumber with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)