Misplaced Pages

James Heilman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:15, 29 January 2014 editOcaasi (talk | contribs)Administrators37,091 edits Reverted 2 edits by QuackGuru: Sorry QG, but the source found the complaint relevant and it was significant that James was targeted outside of Misplaced Pages. Per the citations, it was YOU who demanded sourcing for 'controversial', and you got it. ([[WP:TW...← Previous edit Revision as of 14:19, 29 January 2014 edit undoOcaasi (talk | contribs)Administrators37,091 edits →Misplaced Pages advocacy and controversy: The sources plainly support this as a 'controversy' and the psychologists were indeed described as greatly 'angered'. There's no agenda here, we just reflect the sources.Next edit →
Line 11: Line 11:


== Misplaced Pages advocacy and controversy == == Misplaced Pages advocacy and controversy ==
In 2009, Heilman added ] images of the ink blots used in the ] to the Misplaced Pages article on the subject, and concerned psychologists said that this could invalidate the tests.<ref>{{cite news|last=Laurance|first=Jeremy|title=What do you see here? (the answer could say a lot about you)|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/what-do-you-see-here-the-answer-could-say-a-lot-about-you-1765887.html|accessdate=12 January 2014|newspaper=]|date=01 August 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Sample|first=Ian|title=Testing times for Misplaced Pages after doctor posts secrets of the Rorschach inkblots|url=http://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/jul/29/rorschach-answers-wikipedia|accessdate=12 January 2014|newspaper=]|date=29 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=White|first=Patrick|title=Rorschach and Misplaced Pages: The battle of the inkblots|url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/rorschach-and-wikipedia-the-battle-of-the-inkblots/article4280876/|accessdate=12 January 2014|newspaper=]|date=29 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=2f71584b-a9ea-410f-82ea-f98152bb0444 | title=A secret no longer | work=] | accessdate=9 January 2014}}</ref><ref name=cbc>{{cite web | url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/sask-md-s-wikipedia-posting-of-ink-blots-angers-psychologists-1.848721 | title=Sask. MD's Misplaced Pages posting of ink blots angers psychologists | work=] | date=31 July 2009 | accessdate=9 January 2014}}</ref> However, some psychologists said the test had previously lost its popularity and usefulness.<ref name=cbc/> In an interview with '']'', Heilman stated that he added the entire set because a debate about a single image seemed absurd and psychologists' fears were unfounded.<ref name=nyt>{{cite news | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/29/technology/internet/29inkblot.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 | title=A Rorschach Cheat Sheet on Misplaced Pages? | work=] | date=28 July 2009 | accessdate=9 January 2014 | last=Cohen | first = Noam}}</ref> In August 2009, two Canadian psychologists filed complaints about Heilman to his local doctors' organization; Heilman called the complaints "intimidation tactics."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/business/24inkblot.html | title=Complaint Over Doctor Who Posted Inkblot Test | work=New York Times | accessdate=10 January 2014 | last=Cohen | first = Noam | date = 23 August 2009}}</ref> An extensive debate ensued on Misplaced Pages, and the images were kept.<ref name=nyt/> In 2009, Heilman was involved in a controversy when he added ] images of the Misplaced Pages article on the subject, which angered a number of psychologists who were concerned that it could invalidate the tests.<ref>{{cite news|last=Laurance|first=Jeremy|title=What do you see here? (the answer could say a lot about you)|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/what-do-you-see-here-the-answer-could-say-a-lot-about-you-1765887.html|accessdate=12 January 2014|newspaper=]|date=01 August 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Sample|first=Ian|title=Testing times for Misplaced Pages after doctor posts secrets of the Rorschach inkblots|url=http://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/jul/29/rorschach-answers-wikipedia|accessdate=12 January 2014|newspaper=]|date=29 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=White|first=Patrick|title=Rorschach and Misplaced Pages: The battle of the inkblots|url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/rorschach-and-wikipedia-the-battle-of-the-inkblots/article4280876/|accessdate=12 January 2014|newspaper=]|date=29 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=2f71584b-a9ea-410f-82ea-f98152bb0444 | title=A secret no longer | work=] | accessdate=9 January 2014}}</ref><ref name=cbc>{{cite web | url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/sask-md-s-wikipedia-posting-of-ink-blots-angers-psychologists-1.848721 | title=Sask. MD's Misplaced Pages posting of ink blots angers psychologists | work=] | date=31 July 2009 | accessdate=9 January 2014}}</ref> However, some psychologists said the test had previously lost its popularity and usefulness.<ref name=cbc/> In an interview with '']'', Heilman stated that he added the entire set because a debate about a single image seemed absurd and psychologists' fears were unfounded.<ref name=nyt>{{cite news | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/29/technology/internet/29inkblot.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 | title=A Rorschach Cheat Sheet on Misplaced Pages? | work=] | date=28 July 2009 | accessdate=9 January 2014 | last=Cohen | first = Noam}}</ref> In August 2009, two Canadian psychologists filed complaints about Heilman to his local doctors' organization; Heilman called the complaints "intimidation tactics."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/business/24inkblot.html | title=Complaint Over Doctor Who Posted Inkblot Test | work=New York Times | accessdate=10 January 2014 | last=Cohen | first = Noam | date = 23 August 2009}}</ref> An extensive debate ensued on Misplaced Pages, and the images were kept.<ref name=nyt/>


In 2012, Heilman was one of two ] contributors sued by ] for shifting freely-licensed content and volunteer editors from the for-profit site ] to the non-profit site ]. The ] defended Heilman's actions in the lawsuit, citing volunteer freedom of choice.<ref>{{cite news|last=Cohen|first=Noam|title=Travel Site Built on Wiki Ethos Now Bedevils Its Owner|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/10/business/media/once-a-profit-dream-wikitravel-now-bedevils-owner.html|accessdate=10 January 2014|newspaper=New York Times|date=9 September 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Morris|first=Kevin|title=Wikimedia announces travel site, launches countersuit against competitor|url=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikimedia-wikivoyage-lawsuit/|accessdate=10 January 2014|newspaper=]|date=6 September 2012}}</ref> In February 2013 the parties settled their litigation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57569807-93/wikimedia-internet-brands-settle-wikivoyage-lawsuits/ |title=Wikimedia, Internet Brands settle Wikivoyage lawsuits |work=CNET |first=Steven |last=Musil |date=February 17, 2013 |accessdate=January 20, 2014}}</ref> In 2012, Heilman was one of two ] contributors sued by ] for shifting freely-licensed content and volunteer editors from the for-profit site ] to the non-profit site ]. The ] defended Heilman's actions in the lawsuit, citing volunteer freedom of choice.<ref>{{cite news|last=Cohen|first=Noam|title=Travel Site Built on Wiki Ethos Now Bedevils Its Owner|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/10/business/media/once-a-profit-dream-wikitravel-now-bedevils-owner.html|accessdate=10 January 2014|newspaper=New York Times|date=9 September 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Morris|first=Kevin|title=Wikimedia announces travel site, launches countersuit against competitor|url=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikimedia-wikivoyage-lawsuit/|accessdate=10 January 2014|newspaper=]|date=6 September 2012}}</ref> In February 2013 the parties settled their litigation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57569807-93/wikimedia-internet-brands-settle-wikivoyage-lawsuits/ |title=Wikimedia, Internet Brands settle Wikivoyage lawsuits |work=CNET |first=Steven |last=Musil |date=February 17, 2013 |accessdate=January 20, 2014}}</ref>

Revision as of 14:19, 29 January 2014

James Heilman
Born1979 or 1980 (age 44–45)
CitizenshipCanadian
Medical career
ProfessionDoctor
FieldEmergency room physician
InstitutionsEast Kootenay Regional Hospital, University of British Columbia

James Heilman is an emergency room physician known as an advocate for the improvement of Misplaced Pages's health-related content, and for encouraging other clinicians to contribute to the website. He formerly sat on the Wikimedia Canada board of directors, and is president of Wiki Project Med Foundation. Heilman is a clinical faculty member at the department of emergency medicine at the University of British Columbia, and an emergency physician at East Kootenay Regional Hospital in Cranbrook, British Columbia, where he lives.

Misplaced Pages advocacy and controversy

In 2009, Heilman was involved in a controversy when he added public domain images of the Misplaced Pages article on the subject, which angered a number of psychologists who were concerned that it could invalidate the tests. However, some psychologists said the test had previously lost its popularity and usefulness. In an interview with The New York Times, Heilman stated that he added the entire set because a debate about a single image seemed absurd and psychologists' fears were unfounded. In August 2009, two Canadian psychologists filed complaints about Heilman to his local doctors' organization; Heilman called the complaints "intimidation tactics." An extensive debate ensued on Misplaced Pages, and the images were kept.

In 2012, Heilman was one of two Wikimedia contributors sued by Internet Brands for shifting freely-licensed content and volunteer editors from the for-profit site Wikitravel to the non-profit site Wikivoyage. The Wikimedia Foundation defended Heilman's actions in the lawsuit, citing volunteer freedom of choice. In February 2013 the parties settled their litigation.

Heilman is part of an initiative through Wiki Project Med Foundation with Translators Without Borders, working to improve and translate the top importance English Misplaced Pages medical articles into minority languages.

Publications

  • Misplaced Pages: A Key Tool for Global Public Health Promotion, Journal of Medical Internet Research (2011)
  • Why We Should All Edit Misplaced Pages, University of British Columbia Medical Journal (2011)
  • Creating Awareness for Using a Wiki to Promote Collaborative Health Professional Education, International Journal of User-Driven Health Care (2012)

References

  1. ^ Laidlaw, Katherine (September 2013). "Is Google Making Us Sick?". Reader's Digest. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  2. Fleck, Fiona (1 January 2013). "Online encyclopedia provides free health info for all" (PDF). Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 91 (1). World Health Organization: 8–9. doi:10.2471/BLT.13.030113.. PMID 23397345. Retrieved 9 January 2014. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help)
  3. Mcneil, Mark (04 October 2011). "Misplaced Pages makes a house call to Mac". The Spec. Retrieved 12 January 2014. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. Berko, Lex (2013). "Medical Students Can Now Earn Credit for Editing Misplaced Pages". Vice. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  5. Trujillo, Maria (25 November 2011). "Misplaced Pages and Higher Education – The Infinite Possibilities". University of British Columbia. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  6. Bunim, Juliana. "UCSF First U.S. Medical School to Offer Credit For Misplaced Pages Articles". University of California, San Francisco. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  7. Mathew, Manu; et al. (22 October 2013). "Cochrane and Misplaced Pages: The Collaborative Potential for a Quantum Leap in the Dissemination and Uptake of Trusted Evidence". The Cochrane Library. Retrieved 12 January 2014. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |last= (help)
  8. Laurance, Jeremy (01 August 2009). "What do you see here? (the answer could say a lot about you)". The Independent. Retrieved 12 January 2014. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. Sample, Ian (29 July 2009). "Testing times for Misplaced Pages after doctor posts secrets of the Rorschach inkblots". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  10. White, Patrick (29 July 2009). "Rorschach and Misplaced Pages: The battle of the inkblots". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  11. "A secret no longer". National Post. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  12. ^ "Sask. MD's Misplaced Pages posting of ink blots angers psychologists". CBC News. 31 July 2009. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  13. ^ Cohen, Noam (28 July 2009). "A Rorschach Cheat Sheet on Misplaced Pages?". The New York Times. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  14. Cohen, Noam (23 August 2009). "Complaint Over Doctor Who Posted Inkblot Test". New York Times. Retrieved 10 January 2014.
  15. Cohen, Noam (9 September 2012). "Travel Site Built on Wiki Ethos Now Bedevils Its Owner". New York Times. Retrieved 10 January 2014.
  16. Morris, Kevin (6 September 2012). "Wikimedia announces travel site, launches countersuit against competitor". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 10 January 2014.
  17. Musil, Steven (February 17, 2013). "Wikimedia, Internet Brands settle Wikivoyage lawsuits". CNET. Retrieved January 20, 2014.
  18. Cohen, Noam (12 June 2012). "Book That Plagiarized From Misplaced Pages Is Pulled From Market". New York Times. Retrieved 14 January 2014.
  19. Teigen, Sarah (October–November 2012). "Medical translations for minority languages" (PDF). Multilingual. Retrieved 12 January 2014 – via TranslatorsWithoutBorders.org.
  20. Heilman, James M.; Kemmann, Eckhard; Bonert, Michael; et al. (31 January 2011). "Misplaced Pages: A Key Tool for Global Public Health Promotion". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 13 (1): e14. doi:10.2196/jmir.1589.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  21. Heilman, James (September 2011). "Why We Should All Edit Misplaced Pages" (PDF). University of British Columbia Medical Journal (UBCMJ). 3 (1). Retrieved 14 January 2014.
  22. Heilman, James (2012). "Creating Awareness for Using a Wiki to Promote Collaborative Health Professional Education". International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare. 2 (1): 86–87. doi:10.4018/ijudh.2012010113.

Template:Persondata

Categories:
James Heilman: Difference between revisions Add topic