| Revision as of 05:38, 24 January 2014 editNfomamdoalfrlpsa (talk | contribs)83 edits →stop← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:40, 24 January 2014 edit undoDr.K. (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers110,824 edits Final warning: Refactoring others' talk page comments on Talk:Arms industry. (TW★TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| you are currently engaged in an edit war!! not me!! This is your '''last warning'''stop your irritation '''stop''' --] (]) 05:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | you are currently engaged in an edit war!! not me!! This is your '''last warning'''stop your irritation '''stop''' --] (]) 05:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-tpv4 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning4 --> ] <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">]</span></sup></small> 06:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:40, 24 January 2014
January 2014
Your recent editing history at Arms industry shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. 03:10, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Arms industry, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. 03:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
you are currently engaged in an edit war!! not me!!--Nfomamdoalfrlpsa (talk) 21:48, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
World's largest arms importers
1 India 2 Australia 3 South Korea 4 Singapore 5 United States 6 Saudi Arabia 7 Greece 8 China 9 United Arab Emirates 10 Pakistan 11 Turkey 12 Malaysia 13 Norway 14 Indonesia
source you release is deceitful source i have talked about this --Nfomamdoalfrlpsa (talk) 21:47, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Can you please show me where you "talked about this" and what did you say? I cannot find any evidence of you "talking about it". Thank you. Δρ.Κ. 23:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages--Nfomamdoalfrlpsa (talk) 22:13, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Arms industry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. 23:23, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of former sovereign states shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. 23:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
stop
This is your last warning.
why Rv m contributions!!!!!!--Nfomamdoalfrlpsa (talk) 05:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your irritation or you will be going to be report as a SPAM and blocked from editing--Nfomamdoalfrlpsa (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
source you release is false and delusive information stop Rv m contributions!!!!!! you may wish using dispute resolution stop edit waring!!
you are currently engaged in an edit war!! not me!! This is your last warningstop your irritation stop --Nfomamdoalfrlpsa (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Arms industry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. 06:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)