User talk:Barleybannocks: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:01, 19 November 2013 editBarney the barney barney (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled10,234 edits →Pro-Sheldrake sources: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:40, 19 November 2013 edit undoBbb23 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators271,399 edits →Pseudoscience sanctions notice: warningNext edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	\| icon size = 40px		\| icon size = 40px
	}}<!-- This message is derived from Template:Uw-sanctions -->--] (]) 00:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)		}}<!-- This message is derived from Template:Uw-sanctions -->--] (]) 00:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
			*You have reverted three times today at the ] article. You are already aware that the article is subject to discretionary sanctions. Such behavior is disruptive. Consider this a '''warning''' that if you continue to engage in such conduct, now or in the future, you may be sanctioned '''without notice'''.--] (]) 22:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

	== Pro-Sheldrake sources ==		== Pro-Sheldrake sources ==

Revision as of 22:40, 19 November 2013

something here

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Barleybannocks! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Pseudoscience sanctions notice

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to pseudoscience and fringe science. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

--Bbb23 (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

You have reverted three times today at the Rupert Sheldrake article. You are already aware that the article is subject to discretionary sanctions. Such behavior is disruptive. Consider this a warning that if you continue to engage in such conduct, now or in the future, you may be sanctioned without notice.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Pro-Sheldrake sources

Can you please post them separately, either on my talk page or here. I'm struggling a little might just be a bit tired (not emotional). Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)