Revision as of 21:36, 3 March 2013 editWOSlinker (talk | contribs)Administrators857,744 editsm fix botlink← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:41, 28 August 2013 edit undoBenzband (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,068 edits →Proposed deletion of Continental Congress 2.0: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Can someone look into this situation please.--] (]) 00:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | Can someone look into this situation please.--] (]) 00:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
:I will look into this.--] (]) 01:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | :I will look into this.--] (]) 01:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Proposed deletion of Continental Congress 2.0 == | |||
The ] article, which I created per a request on the project's to-do list, has been been ] by ]. ] (]) 22:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:41, 28 August 2013
Skip to table of contents |
OWS (defunct) | ||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject OWS and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 15 days |
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Move
Proposed to move to "WikiProject Occupy Wall Street" for greater clarity. Rich Farmbrough, 16:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC).
- Was about to suggest the same thing since coming across this. benzband (talk) 16:33, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Why not "WikiProject Occupy movement", since the scope of the project is not just the New York protests.Rangoon11 (talk) 16:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm happy with that. Rich Farmbrough, 16:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC).
- Support move to WikiProject Occupy movement. Gobōnobo 11:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- I'm happy with that. Rich Farmbrough, 16:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC).
- Why not "WikiProject Occupy movement", since the scope of the project is not just the New York protests.Rangoon11 (talk) 16:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Occupy Melbourne is exerting personal pressure on me over a wikipedia edit
This is regarding Occupy Melbourne. http://occupymelbourne.net/2013/02/20/editgate-cyberwar-continuesthe-same-occupy-melbourne-wikipedia-page-edits-redone-but-now-from-biomathematics-and-statistics-scotland/
I believe that I have simply adhere to WP:OR and WP:Verifiability. I have stated that they can undergo usual wikipedia abitration procedures if they disagree. Instead they are posting my personal details online and issuing an ultimatum.
Can someone look into this situation please.--Fangz (talk) 00:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- I will look into this.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Continental Congress 2.0
The Continental Congress 2.0 article, which I created per a request on the project's to-do list, has been been proposed for deletion by User:Thargor Orlando. benzband (talk) 22:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)