| Revision as of 05:47, 18 August 2013 editThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators157,821 edits Closing debate, result was delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:25, 19 August 2013 edit undoFred newman (talk | contribs)78 editsm ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ]. ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 05:47, 18 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | |||
| :{{la|Alahverdian v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, et al}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | |||
| :({{Find sources|Alahverdian v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, et al}}) | |||
| Not notable, ] trial level court case. ] for reform efforts of plaintiff. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 01:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. Notability not achieved. As nom says-soapboxing. ] (]) 03:04, 17 August 2013 (UTC). | |||
| *'''Delete''' - per nom and ]. Clearly not a notable case. ]] 03:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' Appears to be used purely as a soap box. Does not appear to be notable and appears to only receive routine coverage at best. --] (]) 12:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| * '''Delete''' - One legal case out of countless gazillions with no lasting importance to either jurisprudence or American history. ] (]) 17:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete''' - As others have noted, this is one lawsuit out of many non-notable lawsuits. Also, it seems that the suit will soon be dismissed, cementing its irrelevance. Seems to be a pice of soapboxing by the plaintiff. ] (]) 00:21, 18 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||