User talk:Darkness Shines: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:21, 16 June 2013 editDarkness Shines (talk \| contribs)31,762 edits →Unblock III ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:22, 16 June 2013 edit undoDarkness Shines (talk \| contribs)31,762 edits →Unblock III Next edit →
Line 33:		Line 33:
	<nowiki>		<nowiki>
	{{unblock\|reason= How is one revert and adding maintenance tags to an article, all of which was discussed disruptive editing? I just looked over ] and see nothing there to justify this block, let alone two weeks. ] (]) 08:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)}}		{{unblock\|reason= How is one revert and adding maintenance tags to an article, all of which was discussed disruptive editing? I just looked over ] and see nothing there to justify this block, let alone two weeks. ] (]) 08:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)}}
	</~~endnowiki~~>		</nowiki>

	Fuck it, you deserve the socks and copyvios assholes. ~~~~~~~~		Fuck it, you deserve the socks and copyvios assholes. ] (]) 20:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:22, 16 June 2013

This is Darkness Shines's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Archives

This user reserves the right to use profanity on his own talk page.

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Unblock II

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had but one revert to the article in question. One revert is not edit warring. The revert I feel was fully justified as I assumed Ratnakar.kulkarni had made an error as can be seen from the his edit summary and then mine. I also explained on the talk page before reverting him as to why I was going to. My other edits are also explained on the talk page, the update tag was added after I said we are meant to use the most recent and high quality sources available for our articles I added a globalize tag as the article is written purely from an Indian POV, which I also mentioned, albeit obliquely on talk, perhaps I ought to have been clearer. I then added some new content to try for NPOV. And that is it. One revert is not edit warring, and most certainly not worthy of a two week block. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There doesn't need to be a certain number of reverts in a timeframe to be considered edit warring; when the reverts are disruptive, that would be sufficient grounds for a block. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just so you know

I am on you Darkness Shines (talk) 19:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Bihari atrocities

Hi,

What's your take on this proposed deletion? It would be great if peers and neutral editors could take charge of that article. And also, shouldn't the atrocities against Biharis also be considered as part of the 1971 Bangladesh genocide and hence be covered in the 1971 article?--ArmanJ (talk) 17:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Arman. Unfortunately DS is currently blocked (till the 23rd I think) and it wouldn't be wise for him to comment on anything other than the block. Best to wait for a response after he returns. --regentspark (comment) 19:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

User:ArmanJ Sorry but while I am blocked I cannot really comment on an AFD. I will comment on your being reported for edit warring though, the IP you were reverting is an IP sock of user:Nangparbat and as such your reverts are exempted from 3RR. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Nang?

Hi Darkness Shines. Sorry to find my favorite ed blocked. Anyway, do you thing this could be Nang?OrangesRyellow (talk) 14:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

He has used the Three mobile network before so it is possible Darkness Shines (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Unblock III

{{unblock|reason= How is one revert and adding maintenance tags to an article, all of which was discussed disruptive editing? I just looked over ] and see nothing there to justify this block, let alone two weeks. ] (]) 08:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)}}

Fuck it, you deserve the socks and copyvios assholes. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)