| Revision as of 10:50, 1 June 2013 editMichaelQSchmidt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users60,150 edits →Warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:14, 1 June 2013 edit undoLexein (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers17,577 edits →We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks: restore deleted comment which was replied to, and replyingNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks== | ==We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks== | ||
| ''<small>Adding back Lexein comment deleted by Oojamaflipper </small>'' | |||
| ⚫ | to the user Lexein your entry for WSS is full of propaganda and is bias and has opinion all over it. stop being a cunt. | ||
| Please stop deleting sourced content, and adding back POV attack content. I've requested twice that you read and discuss on Talk, because, per ], you were '''b'''old, and I '''r'''everted. Now we '''d'''iscuss before you add such biased content, or delete any other sourced content. There is a way to write an encyclopedic article, and what you're doing is decidedly not it. --] (]) 09:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | to the user Lexein your entry for WSS is full of propaganda and is bias and has opinion all over it. stop being a cunt. | ||
| {{unsigned2|10:20, 1 June 2013 |Oojamaflipper}} | |||
| : Deleting my comment and then replying breaks the sense of the discussion. Anyhoo, you were invited to discuss your problems with the article on its Talk page. What propaganda? What opinion that isn't quoted and/or attributed? BRD applies. Discuss ]. --] (]) 15:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Warning == | == Warning == | ||
Revision as of 15:14, 1 June 2013
We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks
Adding back Lexein comment deleted by Oojamaflipper Please stop deleting sourced content, and adding back POV attack content. I've requested twice that you read and discuss on Talk, because, per WP:BRD, you were bold, and I reverted. Now we discuss before you add such biased content, or delete any other sourced content. There is a way to write an encyclopedic article, and what you're doing is decidedly not it. --Lexein (talk) 09:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
to the user Lexein your entry for WSS is full of propaganda and is bias and has opinion all over it. stop being a cunt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oojamaflipper (talk • contribs) 10:20, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Deleting my comment and then replying breaks the sense of the discussion. Anyhoo, you were invited to discuss your problems with the article on its Talk page. What propaganda? What opinion that isn't quoted and/or attributed? BRD applies. Discuss there on Talk. --Lexein (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Warning
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Schmidt, 10:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)