Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Personal (album): Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:28, 11 November 2012 editRazr Nation (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,892 edits Closing debate, result was keep← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:41, 11 November 2012 edit undo86.44.24.94 (talk) undoing, sorry! only open 4 days and nominator felt stronglyNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
	:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
	<!--Template:Afd top

	Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

	The result was '''keep'''. (]) — ]] 22:28, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
	===]===		===]===
			{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|M}}

	:{{la\|Personal (album)}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)		:{{la\|Personal (album)}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 20:		Line 14:
	*:Well, I'd say I expanded the article quite a bit. <font face="Arial" size="2em">] (])</font> 13:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)		*:Well, I'd say I expanded the article quite a bit. <font face="Arial" size="2em">] (])</font> 13:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
	*::Indeed you have. & let's note the allmusic review and billboard entries constitute multiple WP:RS. ] (]) 21:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)		*::Indeed you have. & let's note the allmusic review and billboard entries constitute multiple WP:RS. ] (]) 21:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 22:41, 11 November 2012

Personal (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I didn't find coverage of this album that would satisfy WP:NALBUMS or WP:GNG. Till 08:56, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Keep made billboard r&b #29, billboard hot 200, spawned three hits, on MJ's label, produced by teddy riley - let's presume this has been written about. 86.44.24.94 (talk) 04:39, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- "Let's presume this has been written about" — we don't presume here on Misplaced Pages. Please read WP:N. Till 06:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
  - Yes we do. I just did. 86.44.24.94 (talk) 12:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
    - Did you even bother to read what I just linked you? "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article." Till 09:17, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
      - yes, & i presume such sources can be found. from WP:N: A topic is ... presumed notable if it meets . a specific criteria from wp:music - A ... ensemble ... may be notable if it ... has had a single or album on any country's national music chart. 86.44.24.94 (talk) 21:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Keep. It's typically hard to find sources on albums that were released such a while ago. A quick search came up with an AllMusic review, which also gives information about it's release date, duration, credits, etc. The album has also charted, which shows some sort of notability. Lastly, it was also released by the record label of Michael Jackson. Article is in bad shape, but could be improved. If it can't be improved enough, a simple redirect to the article's page would do. Statυs (talk) 09:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Well, I'd say I expanded the article quite a bit. Statυs (talk) 13:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Indeed you have. & let's note the allmusic review and billboard entries constitute multiple WP:RS. 86.44.24.94 (talk) 21:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Categories: