Talk:List of airlines of India: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 10:13, 17 March 2012 editAnbu121 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers17,379 edits WP India Assessment← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:40, 18 August 2012 edit undoWilliamJE (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers132,561 edits →New Numbers for Market Share Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:::Dont think market share and revenue stuff really belong on this list article and would be better suited to ], although only having four airlines could be seen as presenting a non-neutral view. ] (]) 12:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)		:::Dont think market share and revenue stuff really belong on this list article and would be better suited to ], although only having four airlines could be seen as presenting a non-neutral view. ] (]) 12:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
	:::: Hi MilborneOne, so we may want to delete both in that case. However, my opinion is that keeping this info will provide helpful insight to the reader who otherwise will have to navigate through scores of webpages to gather this information. What do you say? ] (]) 13:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)		:::: Hi MilborneOne, so we may want to delete both in that case. However, my opinion is that keeping this info will provide helpful insight to the reader who otherwise will have to navigate through scores of webpages to gather this information. What do you say? ] (]) 13:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
			:::::I'm an editor who works on aviation articles and I agree with Jetstreamer and Milborne One, the financial section doesn't belong on this page.] 17:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

	== Protected ==		== Protected ==

Revision as of 17:40, 18 August 2012

Aviation: Airlines / Defunct airlines List‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

List

This article has been rated as List-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the airline project.
	This article is supported by the Defunct Airlines task force.

India: Transport List‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Transport in India workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

New Numbers for Market Share

New Numbers (March 2008) for Market Share is available! Just take a look here! : -ama-

I don't think market share and economic performance tables should belong to the article. If they should, why not spelling out the numbers for all the Indian airlines rather than doing so for just four of them, which are the biggest ones by the way? I suspect the numbers for the rest are hard to get and that's the reason for their absence...--Jetstreamer (talk) 04:29, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Although I had updated the Financial info, but I agree with Jetstreamer that, both Market Share and Economic Performance tables can be done away with. If we decide to leave it there, I will make sure it is updated on regular basis. Your thoughts please. Cheers AKS (talk) 06:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Dont think market share and revenue stuff really belong on this list article and would be better suited to Transport in India, although only having four airlines could be seen as presenting a non-neutral view. MilborneOne (talk) 12:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi MilborneOne, so we may want to delete both in that case. However, my opinion is that keeping this info will provide helpful insight to the reader who otherwise will have to navigate through scores of webpages to gather this information. What do you say? AKS (talk) 13:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm an editor who works on aviation articles and I agree with Jetstreamer and Milborne One, the financial section doesn't belong on this page....William 17:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Protected

Alright people, stop reverting each other and debate the inclusion of the revenue table like civilized editors please. If you can come to a agreement to not change the status quo until a consensus is reached, I'll be happy to unprotect. Cheers, henrik•talk 18:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Categories: