| Revision as of 12:22, 15 August 2012 view sourceViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,937 edits →WP:MOUNTAIN: ce← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:25, 15 August 2012 view source StillStanding-247 (talk | contribs)4,601 edits →WP:MOUNTAINNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| :::It exists when I get reported daily and have to waste all of my time refuting these false reports. ] (]) 12:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | :::It exists when I get reported daily and have to waste all of my time refuting these false reports. ] (]) 12:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::::You don't have to respond. The first step is learning what to ignore. The problem, however, is what is going to happen next time when a different admin than Black Kite doesn't bother to look over the report and blocks you for edit warring regardless of how many reverts you did or did not make? So, it's time to change your strategy. Have you read ]? I ask, because it is a good place to start. ] (]) 12:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | ::::You don't have to respond. The first step is learning what to ignore. The problem, however, is what is going to happen next time when a different admin than Black Kite doesn't bother to look over the report and blocks you for edit warring regardless of how many reverts you did or did not make? So, it's time to change your strategy. Have you read ]? I ask, because it is a good place to start. ] (]) 12:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::::You haven't really looked at my history, have you? I tried ] repeatedly but found that, while at least one of the volunteers was competent and worked to actually resolve the dispute, at least two of them just took a vote and tried to pretend it was a consensus. DRN is broken and I have a now-revoked Barnstar for saying so. Check out my user page history. | |||
| :::::Let's be realistic: there's nothing I can do now to stop the WikiProject Conservatism posse from continuing to file false reports until I'm blocked '''unless''' they are prevented from doing so. ] (]) 12:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:25, 15 August 2012
How to abuse a talk page.
In a recent post, Lionelt outlined a simple plan to get rid of me:
- Guy like that are just the cost of doing business at Misplaced Pages. Once his talkpage fills up with enough warnings and blocks someone will take him to ANI. He'll get a second chance, then a mentor, then another chance, then some kind of voluntary sanctions, then a topic ban, and when he finally realizes he won't be able to push his POV he'll disappear. Going by his edit frequency, this process will take a couple months. Just be patient, always warn him on his talk when he's disruptive, and never never edit war with him. That only engenders sympathy for him.– Lionel 07:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Not coincidentally, when I cleared my talk page, the person he was writing to immediately reverted my wipe. I think it's painfully obvious what's going on here.
I have nothing to hide; I'm proud of my small achievements here and I fully expect that some people will be unhappy with them. However, this talk page is not going to serve as a sewer for these people to fill with bogus notices intended to create the illusion of a pattern of disruptive editing. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 09:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
JS
Wade in at your peril.... ;0) OliverTwisted (Stuff) 08:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- No, thanks. I don't care enough about this to bother. I've explained why User:JournalScholar is wrong to make those changes, but I'm leaving it at that. Editors with more patience are free to pick up the ball. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 08:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Paul Ryan
Your right that wasn't a minor change. My bad.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 00:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Mistakes happen; no big deal. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 00:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
August 2012
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
WP:MOUNTAIN
- I think you're going to lose an editor at this rate, because I'm not willing to put up with this BS.
You've got to put up with a hell of a lot more than that to survive around here. Filing reports at ANI against the people you are involved in a content dispute with doesn't work. I thought you knew that by now. Viriditas (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- This isn't a content dispute, it's a vendetta. Good to know you have my back. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 12:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- The vendetta only exists if you acknowledge it. Your reaction is much more powerful than anything Lionel and Belchfire can say or do, and the cool thing is, you are in complete control of it. Use it wisely. Viriditas (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- It exists when I get reported daily and have to waste all of my time refuting these false reports. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 12:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- You don't have to respond. The first step is learning what to ignore. The problem, however, is what is going to happen next time when a different admin than Black Kite doesn't bother to look over the report and blocks you for edit warring regardless of how many reverts you did or did not make? So, it's time to change your strategy. Have you read Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution? I ask, because it is a good place to start. Viriditas (talk) 12:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- You haven't really looked at my history, have you? I tried WP:DRN repeatedly but found that, while at least one of the volunteers was competent and worked to actually resolve the dispute, at least two of them just took a vote and tried to pretend it was a consensus. DRN is broken and I have a now-revoked Barnstar for saying so. Check out my user page history.
- Let's be realistic: there's nothing I can do now to stop the WikiProject Conservatism posse from continuing to file false reports until I'm blocked unless they are prevented from doing so. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 12:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- You don't have to respond. The first step is learning what to ignore. The problem, however, is what is going to happen next time when a different admin than Black Kite doesn't bother to look over the report and blocks you for edit warring regardless of how many reverts you did or did not make? So, it's time to change your strategy. Have you read Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution? I ask, because it is a good place to start. Viriditas (talk) 12:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- It exists when I get reported daily and have to waste all of my time refuting these false reports. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 12:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- The vendetta only exists if you acknowledge it. Your reaction is much more powerful than anything Lionel and Belchfire can say or do, and the cool thing is, you are in complete control of it. Use it wisely. Viriditas (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)