| Revision as of 02:07, 12 August 2012 editGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,104 edits →Talkback: left talkback note← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:03, 13 August 2012 edit undoStatus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors69,287 edits →Eurovision articles: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ==Talkback== | ==Talkback== | ||
| {{Talkback|Gene93k|Doing your job?|ts=02:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)}} | {{Talkback|Gene93k|Doing your job?|ts=02:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)}} | ||
| == Eurovision articles == | |||
| Something has to be done about this. There are so many not-notable articles of groups that were in Eurovision, with members of the project saying there are notable just because they were a part of it. That is completely incorrect, and quite laughable, in my opinion. I'd like to hear your thoughts on the matter. Best, <font face="Arial" size="2em">] (])</font> 04:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:03, 13 August 2012
 Archives |
Talkback
Message added 02:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Eurovision articles
Something has to be done about this. There are so many not-notable articles of groups that were in Eurovision, with members of the project saying there are notable just because they were a part of it. That is completely incorrect, and quite laughable, in my opinion. I'd like to hear your thoughts on the matter. Best, Statυs (talk) 04:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC)