Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:33, 5 June 2012

Azerbaijan B‑class High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan B This article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Armenia B‑class High‑importance

Khojaly massacre is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian B This article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on February 25, 2008 and February 25, 2012.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Hürriyet, correspondent of "Le Monde", etc.

Hürriyet, correspondent of "Le Monde", head of Turkish Parliament’s Human Rights Commission - reliable sources. They say about Istambul's march. This is no offtopic. Please, read Misplaced Pages:Content disclaimer. Divot (talk) 11:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Every has a right for such rallies. Nothing extraordinary happened apart from that "strong sense of nationalism", no one was killed or wounded. Brandmeister 11:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

You are right about "killed or wounded". But we don't say that "someone was killed or wounded", we just say, after Hürriyet etc., that "The protest was heavy with ultranationalist sentiment" and "The head of Turkish Parliament’s Human Rights Commission, Ayhan Sefer Üstün, called on the country’s prosecutors...". This is an important information about such rallies. Divot (talk) 11:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

P.S. If you think "Nothing extraordinary happened", we can delete all information about such rallies. Are you agree? Divot (talk) 11:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Why it was "ultranationalist"? Unless something important happened, the inclusion of that is discouraged per WP:NPOV (and WP:WEIGHT), it's just an opinion, not an important info. Brandmeister 12:08, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

"Why it was "ultranationalist"?" Because reliable source Hürriyet says "The protest was heavy with ultranationalist sentiment".

Of course, this is important information about the rally, because the few of first-class media, describing the event, notes the nationalist sentiment. Divot (talk) 12:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Like Plato said that :) The reliable sources do not automatically guarantee inclusion because they should be balanced against neutrality in particular. Brandmeister 13:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Of course, but if the leading newspaper describe rally in the article "Racism mars Khojaly protest in Taksim", it means that this is "balanced neutrality". Divot (talk) 13:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

This is still should be balanced against Misplaced Pages's neutrality policy. The rally itself, as the articles say, was not an ultranationalist as a whole: "Some protesters, however, said they had no problems with Turkish-Armenians but added that they were marching to draw attention to the Khojaly Massacre". Brandmeister 13:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

I add oficial position of head of Turkish Parliament’s Human Rights Commission. 14:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Divot (talk • contribs)

OR derived from an image

Parishan, to use content translated from the supposed screenshot of an email that is on the webpage at http://panorama.am/en/politics/2012/03/02/xocali-lidice-kellerova/ would be original research. Beyond questions about the veracity of any translation, we don't know anything about this email, whether it is the complete email, the only email, etc. The actual article does not contain any of the new content you inserted, but the article does contain the content that you deleted. Meowy 02:00, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Fair use candidate from Commons: File:Hocali anit.jpg

The file File:Hocali anit.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Hocali anit.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 08:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Falsification of history

Today, a subsection on Falsification of History was added by me, but user brandmeister removed it. I was suggested to discuss it for the first and then get it back. So I'm ready for any questions related to the text . Gazifikator (talk) 23:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

I found no mention of Khojaly in Markedonov. Why did you try to include sources that do not support your assertions? Grandmaster 07:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

For a little peace of text 4 sources are used. If even Markedonov is problematic, according to your post, you agree others are reliable. I see no problem as a consensus to delete Markedonov's name and source. Hopefully you will not continue Brandmeister's line, time after time changing your attitude. Gazifikator (talk) 07:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

This source is about events in Guba: Grandmaster 19:46, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Manipulations on Khojaly is a well known topic. This paragraph should be expanded. Sprutt (talk) 23:07, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Schnirelmann and Markedonov wrote nothing about the criticism of the word "genocide" in the provided references and do not even mention the massacre. Also, as I wrote previously in the edit summary, the sentence about Quban Jews is not relevant. And do not remove the official death toll by Azerbaijani authorities until consensus is reached to do so. So far there is no evidence against those figures. Brandmeister 12:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

The edit by Sprutt violates neutrality policy and de Waal says nothing of falsification of history.Ladytimide (talk) 18:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

• B-Class Azerbaijan articles
• High-importance Azerbaijan articles
• WikiProject Azerbaijan articles
• B-Class Armenian articles
• High-importance Armenian articles
• WikiProject Armenia articles
• Selected anniversaries (February 2008)
• Selected anniversaries (February 2012)