| Revision as of 17:02, 28 February 2012 editMabuska (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,831 edits Reverted to revision 479284480 by Mabuska. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:32, 28 February 2012 edit undoBjmullan (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,478 edits →carlingford lough: please read WP:AVOIDYOUNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| ::::No as the dispute resolutuion is an on-going process. The more opinions the better. No change should ever be made until the issue has been officially sorted. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC) | ::::No as the dispute resolutuion is an on-going process. The more opinions the better. No change should ever be made until the issue has been officially sorted. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I wonder why I even bothered commenting at the DR as you seem to know my motives and feel the need to point them out. Isn't it's a shame you don't know ]. ] (]) 19:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | == ] of ] == | ||
| ]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] <sup>]</sup> 11:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC) | ]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] <sup>]</sup> 11:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:32, 28 February 2012
 | Three simple rules:
|
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Glenconkeyne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clooney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
carlingford lough
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Carlingford Lough - Location field". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gravyring (talk • contribs) 22:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Good points Mabuska.Gravyring (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC).
- You did the right thing in taking it to the Dispute Resolution Board, or any form of dispute resolution as after all as its subject to the Troubles Arbitration means that editors that come into a dispite must seek third-party opinions. Mabuska 23:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Does this mean it is safe to make the change?Gravyring (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC).
- No as the dispute resolutuion is an on-going process. The more opinions the better. No change should ever be made until the issue has been officially sorted. Mabuska 23:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- I wonder why I even bothered commenting at the DR as you seem to know my motives and feel the need to point them out. Isn't it's a shame you don't know wikipedia policy. Bjmullan (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- No as the dispute resolutuion is an on-going process. The more opinions the better. No change should ever be made until the issue has been officially sorted. Mabuska 23:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox NI Civil Parish
Template:Infobox NI Civil Parish has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mabuska 11:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)