Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rejedef: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:12, 6 January 2012 editRejedef (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users763 edits leaving wikipedia← Previous edit Revision as of 06:24, 6 January 2012 edit undoQwyrxian (talk | contribs)57,186 edits Undid revision 469851096 by Rejedef (talk) You may remove everything else, but while the block is in effect, it needs to stay hereNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== January 2012 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. Keep this up when your block is up, and I'll make it longer next time, and eventually just indefinitely block you. DIscuss. The. Issue. There are valid concerns on the talk page of that and ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Alleged edit war - instead it was continuous editing&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 04:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
{{unblock reviewed | 1=No reason to block --Rejedef 22:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC) | decline=Not correct: you were clearly edit warring. ] (]) 07:55, 5 January 2012 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 06:24, 6 January 2012

January 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Eastern Europe. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Keep this up when your block is up, and I'll make it longer next time, and eventually just indefinitely block you. DIscuss. The. Issue. There are valid concerns on the talk page of that and Western Europe. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Alleged edit war - instead it was continuous editing~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rejedef (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No reason to block --Rejedef 22:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Not correct: you were clearly edit warring. Nick-D (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User talk:Rejedef: Difference between revisions Add topic