| Revision as of 14:26, 22 November 2011 editNmate (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,033 edits →Sorry to bother you← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:56, 22 November 2011 edit undoTParis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators30,360 edits →Sorry to bother you: Re NmateNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| It looks to me that ] also have some problems with agressive users who treat Misplaced Pages as battleground while at the same time he has also engaged in edit warring over multiple articles triggered by his POV pushing as can been from his edit history just with an idle click . Does his report remind you of anything ? | It looks to me that ] also have some problems with agressive users who treat Misplaced Pages as battleground while at the same time he has also engaged in edit warring over multiple articles triggered by his POV pushing as can been from his edit history just with an idle click . Does his report remind you of anything ? | ||
| :Natch, I remember that you told me that you were tried of it , however, I received a highly controversial one long month ArbCom block for wikistaling and editwarring issued by ] who I have never ever encountered on Misplaced Pages; it is likely that Ironholds is a talk page stalker of yours. Please note that the diffs could be as old as 5 days within the block entry at that time when I received the ArbCom block. Furthermore, it is not possible to issue a digwurren block for edit warring unless I am subject to a revert restriction as per WP: digwurren ,nor is it possible to corroborate wikistalking with 3 diffs without formal proceeding. It is a serious claim, and it requires very serious proofs. And in case there is no formal proceeding, a block still requieres some kind of interaction between the blocking administrator and blocked user and that did not happen. So I am obliged to appeal this poppycock unless I want to leave Misplaced Pages.--] (]) 14:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | :Natch, I remember that you told me that you were tried of it , however, I received a highly controversial one long month ArbCom block for wikistaling and editwarring issued by ] who I have never ever encountered on Misplaced Pages; it is likely that Ironholds is a talk page stalker of yours. Please note that the diffs could be as old as 5 days within the block entry at that time when I received the ArbCom block. Furthermore, it is not possible to issue a digwurren block for edit warring unless I am subject to a revert restriction as per WP: digwurren ,nor is it possible to corroborate wikistalking with 3 diffs without formal proceeding. It is a serious claim, and it requires very serious proofs. And in case there is no formal proceeding, a block still requieres some kind of interaction between the blocking administrator and blocked user and that did not happen. So I am obliged to appeal this poppycock unless I want to leave Misplaced Pages.--] (]) 14:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::As your block happened on 5 October, you were placed on noticed based on the old restrictions at ]. You were of the editing restriction on 17 April 2008. ] nor ] require you to have interacted with the blocking administrator prior to being blocked. In fact, the opposite is true. It is more appropriate for the blocking administrator to be ]. I cannot see how this new dispute Omen1229 has with these other editors relates to you other than that he has a dispute. But trust me that the folks who response on ] will take full inspection of Omen1229's behavior in addition to the user's he has reported and if they find any problems, the ] effect will likely happen. I'd suggest you ] and ] before you find yourself under more restrictions or blocks relating to this issue. I'd rather not see you quit editing over this, but you should know that this behavior is ]. You need to ] for ] and just forget about him. Edit your own area of interest and just avoid contact and editing overlap with him.--v/r - ]] 14:56, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:56, 22 November 2011
| This is TParis's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
| USER PAGE | TALK PAGE | CONTRIBUTIONS | AWARDS | DASHBOARD | RECALL | MOTIVES | POLITICS | RTRC |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
v/r?
I'm either over- or under-thinking, but I can't work out what means "v/r". Splain? —Scheinwerfermann ·C04:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- It means "Very Respectfully"--v/r - TP 15:00, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/South America Life Quality Rankings
Hello. I was looking through AfDs and noticed that there are two articles that were a part of this AfD that you closed that weren't deleted. I marked them for G7 which is the reason you gave for closing the debate. Just thought I'd mention it here in case you wanted to finish the job. OlYeller21 19:02, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Done.--v/r - TP 19:52, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Auburn Alumni Association
While cleaning up orphan talk pages, I ran across Talk:Auburn Alumni Association. It ended up orphaned because I think you got a little mixed up with the redirect/deletion per the results of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Auburn Alumni Association. You deleted the talk page, but then recreated it as a redirect to List of Auburn University people. You then deleted the article. I restored Auburn Alumni Association, set the redirect, and deleted the redirect's talk page for you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh thanks. I don't know how that happened.--v/r - TP 14:24, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
talkpage malf.
Hi TParis, apparently you were the one who helped me with my talk page design, User:Η-θ/l. Well now my talkpage is kind-of malfunctioning by having the text go outside the green box. Would you please care to fix it? vr, Eta-theta (14:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC))
Excuse me??
Hello, TParis - Would you care to explain why you removed (without even a word of explanation) Category:Police brutality in California from the article Occupy Cal? I hope you will refrain from removing other valid categories in the future. Regards, Cgingold (talk) 08:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Do you have a source that says specifically "police brutality"? If not, than the category violates WP:NPOV.--v/r - TP 15:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you
Hello TParis,
It looks to me that User:Omen1229 also have some problems with agressive users who treat Misplaced Pages as battleground here while at the same time he has also engaged in edit warring over multiple articles triggered by his POV pushing as can been from his edit history just with an idle click . Does his report remind you of anything ?
- Natch, I remember that you told me that you were tried of it , however, I received a highly controversial one long month ArbCom block for wikistaling and editwarring issued by User:Ironholds who I have never ever encountered on Misplaced Pages; it is likely that Ironholds is a talk page stalker of yours. Please note that the diffs could be as old as 5 days within the block entry at that time when I received the ArbCom block. Furthermore, it is not possible to issue a digwurren block for edit warring unless I am subject to a revert restriction as per WP: digwurren ,nor is it possible to corroborate wikistalking with 3 diffs without formal proceeding. It is a serious claim, and it requires very serious proofs. And in case there is no formal proceeding, a block still requieres some kind of interaction between the blocking administrator and blocked user and that did not happen. So I am obliged to appeal this poppycock here unless I want to leave Misplaced Pages.--Nmate (talk) 14:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- As your block happened on 5 October, you were placed on noticed based on the old restrictions at WP:DIGWUREN. You were notified of the editing restriction on 17 April 2008. WP:BLOCK nor WP:DIGWUREN require you to have interacted with the blocking administrator prior to being blocked. In fact, the opposite is true. It is more appropriate for the blocking administrator to be uninvolved. I cannot see how this new dispute Omen1229 has with these other editors relates to you other than that he has a dispute. But trust me that the folks who response on WP:ANI will take full inspection of Omen1229's behavior in addition to the user's he has reported and if they find any problems, the WP:BOOMERANG effect will likely happen. I'd suggest you drop the stick and let it go before you find yourself under more restrictions or blocks relating to this issue. I'd rather not see you quit editing over this, but you should know that this behavior is disruptive. You need to quit blaming others for the wikistalking and just forget about him. Edit your own area of interest and just avoid contact and editing overlap with him.--v/r - TP 14:56, 22 November 2011 (UTC)