| Revision as of 03:02, 19 August 2011 editRonaldMerchant (talk | contribs)128 editsm fool← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:08, 19 August 2011 edit undoRonaldMerchant (talk | contribs)128 edits →One law for the established users, one law for the newcomes: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| :Look, if he doesn't want conflict, why does he keep prolonging it? And bringing everything to admin? Leave me alone, and I'll leave him alone ] (]) 02:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC) | :Look, if he doesn't want conflict, why does he keep prolonging it? And bringing everything to admin? Leave me alone, and I'll leave him alone ] (]) 02:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == One law for the established users, one law for the newcomes == | |||
| SarekOfVulcan, suck my balls little bitch. ] (]) 03:08, 19 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:08, 19 August 2011
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, RonaldMerchant, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Hebron. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
London and use of minor edit flag
Hi, regardless of the merit of your edit which I disagreed with and undid, you should definitely not mark such edits as minor. Cheers, --John (talk) 07:11, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- I see you have removed this a third time. At least you didn't flag it as minor this time, thanks for that. Rather than edit-warring, why not join the discussion at Talk:London and see if you can justify this removal? --John (talk) 07:25, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Re-adding stuff to people's talk pages
Users are allowed to remove items from their talk page, and by removing it they acknowledge that they read the item, so please stop undoing his edit. ZamorakO o (talk) 01:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Edit warring
Reviewing your recent contributions, while I don't necessarily disagree with the material being added, I think you should review WP:BRD. Typically, when you insert material and another user reverts that addition, you discuss it on the relevant talk page. Falcon8765 02:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
This was a mandatory note, not harassment. Tune it down a little. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556
- Look, if he doesn't want conflict, why does he keep prolonging it? And bringing everything to admin? Leave me alone, and I'll leave him alone RonaldMerchant (talk) 02:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
One law for the established users, one law for the newcomes
SarekOfVulcan, suck my balls little bitch. RonaldMerchant (talk) 03:08, 19 August 2011 (UTC)