Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
So why cant you reply to what you didn't remove?? --] (]) 17:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
So why cant you reply to what you didn't remove?? --] (]) 17:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
==Question==
I was wondering if this edit is a violation of my topic ban. It was reverted by one of the most "involved" editors in the whole Shakespeare authorship dispute, which I didn't think was proper, as I had asked an administrator to weigh in on whether the topic ban extended to the Signpost discussion of an off-wiki artcle . Thanks, ] (]) 22:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
This user page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump. The Mediation Committee has been disbanded as a result of this discussion. Other dispute resolution processes should be used for content issues.
The logo of the Mediation Committee while it was active
The Mediation Committee was a panel of editors who resolved content disputes on Misplaced Pages articles by providing formal mediation. The Mediation Committee was established with the Arbitration Committee in 2003 by Jimmy Wales and was the last stage of content dispute resolution on the English Misplaced Pages. Mediation was entered into voluntarily by the parties to the dispute and did not result in binding resolutions. The Mediation Committee policy documented how the Mediation Committee, its mediators, and the formal mediation process operated. This policy was maintained by the Committee and was considered an authoritative codification of how Committee matters should be conducted.
Previous requests for mediation are indexed below. Please note that mediation often took place on the talk page; the latter box allows those pages to be searched.
I was wondering if this edit is a violation of my topic ban. It was reverted by one of the most "involved" editors in the whole Shakespeare authorship dispute, which I didn't think was proper, as I had asked an administrator to weigh in on whether the topic ban extended to the Signpost discussion of an off-wiki artcle . Thanks, Smatprt (talk) 22:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
User talk:Arcticocean: Difference between revisions
Add topic
