Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:03, 16 March 2006

In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was 20:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 16:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC).

• (Prasi90 | talk | contributions)

IP of user is also 202.177.246.3 (talk · contribs)

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

Description

The user is vandalising, orchestrating countless personal attacks and voting on RfAs against the wishes of blocking admins.

Evidence of disputed behavior

Not all examples of disputed behaviour may be listed below. For a full list of Prasi90's edits, see Special:Contributions/Prasi90.

Vandalism (primarily of India- and Pakistan-related articles):

Extreme POV attacks: ,

Personal attacks or attacks against culture: , , , , , ,

RfA trolling: , , -

See also User talk:Prasi90#Threats and User talk:Prasi90#Disruption for other users' comments.

Side comment: User blocked 24 hours for harassment of users endorsing dispute. NSLE _(T+C) at 07:34 UTC (2006-03-15)

Applicable policies

1. WP:VAND
2. WP:TROLL
3. WP:ATTACK

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

1. Block log
2. Comments on talk page
3. Comments by Prasi90 on MONGO's talk page: ,
4. Asked to stop vandalizing by Bhadani
5. Asked to remain civil by Computerjoe

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

(sign with ~~~~)

1. MONGO 20:37, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
2. A user named Jaranda had claimed that he had tried to solve this dispute with me {Prasi90}.However,I have never even heard from this person before as can be verified by looking at my talk page.For this reason I removed Jaranda's edit,since this person has not contacted me about this matter.If my deleting Jaranda's claim was against policy,I assure you that I did not intentionally go against Misplaced Pages policy.Please excuse me if I have in any way violated policy.Thank You.

Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

1. haz _(user talk) 20:08, 14 March 2006
2. Mmeinhart 03:51, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
3. --rogerd 05:14, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
4. NSLE _(T+C) at 07:24 UTC (2006-03-15)
5. --Chachu207 ::: Talk to me 14:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section. Please check my contributions page.You will notice that I have created 4 new pages-Bird Flu In India Zee Cafe Maharashtra Navnirman Sena and Manu Bhandari.Also I have made many positive edits and have added stub tags to quite a few articles.I have been treated also been asked to "grow up and be a good scout" by MONGO,as can be seen on my talk page-is this not uncivil?.I have already been blocked for any offences commited by me in the past.After that I have stopped making such offensive edits.Also as regards my RfA votes,why can I not vote as I please?My productive edits outnumber my offensive ones.Be a good scout and grow up now. This is not a playground.--MONGO 17:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)-This comment by MONGO is one of many he has made against me.Please note how he urges me to "grow up".He has in the past said such uncivil things to me.Is uncilivity not against Misplaced Pages policy? Let me now apologise to the entire Misplaced Pages community for those foolish,unnessecary edits.Also,as for changing my ways,if you would notice I recently cleaned up my userpage by deleting the Anti-American userbox I had put there.The summary for the said edit is "MONGO has a point".I request you to please allow me to continue editing since I have turned over a new leaf.Afetr all,how many times must I be punished for the same offences?I trust that in I will be treated justly by the Misplaced Pages Community.The bottomline is that my useful edits far outnumber my harmful ones.As for the user Jaranda who claims he has tried to solve this dispute,I have never even heard from him till now.Please help me out.Prasi90 01:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.