| Revision as of 03:42, 10 June 2011 editAmandaNP (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators45,707 edits →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: +cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:01, 11 June 2011 edit undoNmate (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,033 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
| Also, it is more than obvious that Bizovne is a meatuppet of Iaaasi. According to this ANI-report | |||
| :''"Banned user ] is sending e-mails to myself and at least two other editors in attempt to get people to edit Misplaced Pages on his behalf. He says that if people don't file sock puppet reports and do his bidding in other ways, it means he is allowed to engage in sock puppetry. I have cut off his e-mail access but he already has the addresses of several users."'' | |||
| * ] displayed the same map on his user page as what was on the user page of Iaaasi with which the user plainly signed that became a recruited meat-puppet of Iaaasi, in my opinion. | |||
| *Two days ago, Bizone initiated a checkuser request at ] on which page, the most active participant is Iaaasi and his sockpuppets | |||
| *Yesterday, following me to the article ], reverted me and the next user who edited this article was ] against whom there is an ongoing checkuser request as to whether the user is Iaaasi, or isn't. For more information about this checkuser ,which is closely related to this one, you can find here: ] --] (]) 09:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 09:01, 11 June 2011
Bizovne
Bizovne (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bizovne/Archive.
– An administrator or SPI clerk has placed this case on hold pending further information or developments.
09 June 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 195.28.75.114 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 193.87.75.82 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Just a few days have passed since the expiration of the last block given to Bizovne and he seems to have resumed his old habits of "emphasizing his point" with additional socks if necessary. This happened most prominently at the Ányos Jedlik article, which seems to be his favorite one (, and ). So when the other editors didn't relent, he just used his first IP then his second just to "emphasize his point". I'm not sure why's he doing this, but if you check the edit logs of the IP addresses (especially 195.28.75.114) you'll see that he's already done this in the past. He has first proceeded to confirm his sockpuppetry by using a forged signature, then he's revealed that both IPs are his by replying on my talk page using his IPs (please see the translation section for details).
All of the events detailed above have happened in the past few days right after his month-long block has expired. Essentially the only difference between the current situation and the one from a month ago (before he was blocked) that he didn't call me a Fascist this time.
Still, there's one more interesting thing about Bizovne's edits and behavior: when doing his reverts he's marked most of them as "minor edits" and stated that he's reverting vandalism, just like Iaaasi did (see and ). It's also apparent that at least two of Bizovne's edits ( and ) were reverts of one of Stubes99's socks, which's also Iaaasi's favorite "hobby" on WP (see , and ). Both these clues seem to point to meatpuppetry..... -- CoolKoon (talk) 21:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Also, it is more than obvious that Bizovne is a meatuppet of Iaaasi. According to this ANI-report on 27 April 2011
- "Banned user Iaaasi is sending e-mails to myself and at least two other editors in attempt to get people to edit Misplaced Pages on his behalf. He says that if people don't file sock puppet reports and do his bidding in other ways, it means he is allowed to engage in sock puppetry. I have cut off his e-mail access but he already has the addresses of several users."
- On 29 April 2011 User:Bizovne displayed the same map on his user page as what was on the user page of Iaaasi with which the user plainly signed that became a recruited meat-puppet of Iaaasi, in my opinion.
- Two days ago, Bizone initiated a checkuser request at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stubes99 on which page, the most active participant is Iaaasi and his sockpuppets
- Yesterday, following me to the article Stephen Bocskay, reverted me and the next user who edited this article was user:Dadamereu against whom there is an ongoing checkuser request as to whether the user is Iaaasi, or isn't. For more information about this checkuser ,which is closely related to this one, you can find here: Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Iaaasi --Nmate (talk) 09:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- On hold pending further investigation, hoping to be back in 1 or 2 days. Poke me on my TP if i'm not back. -- DQ (t) (e) 03:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Categories: