User talk:Nableezy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 14:46, 7 May 2011 view sourceAgadaUrbanit (talk \| contribs)Pending changes reviewers8,961 edits →May 2011: feel free to remove this WP:EW level 2 warning, though article talk pages should stay WP:CIVIL clean environment← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:50, 7 May 2011 view source Nableezy (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,194 edits →May 2011: rv trollingNext edit →
Line 136:		Line 136:
	:::::I don't think S----m is a sock. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 22:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)		:::::I don't think S----m is a sock. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 22:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
	:::::I dont think so either, but that user hasnt really made me aware of them, so I cant say Ive actually looked all that carefully. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 22:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)</small>		:::::I dont think so either, but that user hasnt really made me aware of them, so I cant say Ive actually looked all that carefully. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 22:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)</small>

	== May 2011 ==
	I'm not sure why you keep editing out of consensus in ]. That might appear as ]. And you are free to remove this warning. ] (]) 14:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:50, 7 May 2011

I was smoking the other night and I began to violently cough. I coughed so hard that I pulled a muscle in my back. So what did I do next? Smoked some more to try to ease the pain.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Palestinian singer

You wouldn't be aware of singer named Mais Shalash, would you? She has an Arabic article (albeit, kind of small). But I am interested in making an English one. -asad (talk) 23:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Nope, sorry. nableezy - 12:12, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

There's this thing called ice hockey

I don't know if the NHL makes the news down there. But now that the series is tied, I was wondering if you'd like to go double or nothing on those pictures that are still on my userpage. I was thinking just the team jersey pictures from the infoboxes. Sort of like how the mayors do that. Cause we pretty much run this place. I used to think it was admins but it turns out they're more like janitors. --JGGardiner (talk) 08:57, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I didnt have the heart to talk any trash, if yall lose I can only say sorry. But you cant have the jerseys, copyrighted logos. nableezy - 12:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I see. Well you're free to honour the Canucks or just Vancouver any way you'd like. Maybe Nish would help you with a poem. --JGGardiner (talk) 09:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations. Though we should have finished yall off in that power play, Lu was looking like a scared kid. Ill figure something out for the userpage. nableezy - 13:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

But I really should explain to you what the phrase "double or nothing" means (and I cannot understand why a Muslim would need to explain this to a heathen). We had a bet last year, I won. A "double or nothing" bet this year would mean, if I won, I would double my winnings (or in this case you would double your losses). If you won, we would go to a pre-last year state, the "nothing" in "double or nothing". But Ill do something special for the userpage, maybe use the Canuckistani colors in that userbox on the bottom. nableezy - 16:09, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm not sure what I was thinking saying "double or nothing". Maybe I just meant on my user page I had intended to keep the old pictures and add something new. Sorry about that one. --JGGardiner (talk) 21:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

You know your signature has been red on black for a really long time. I'm just saying. --JGGardiner (talk) 21:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Thats for Egypt, not the Bulls or Hawks. And that aint changing, slap yourself for even suggesting it. nableezy - 21:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

good enough? nableezy - 16:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

That's beautiful, thanks. And I was meaning to change the other edit too. Especially since it was moved by Kinetochore. By the way, you have my permission to remove any stupid comments I make. Just let me know when you do and I'll put them back after if I disagree. I guess you'd have to link this post in your edit summary. --JGGardiner (talk) 23:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I would indeed sing praises to Canucks

In lilting iambic rhythms if I knew

Hów that word's pronounced, to rhyme with 'fucks'?,

Or is it 'chooks'? So, please oblige, thank you.

If delicacy would sidestep vulgar tones,

Of course I could well ring the changes on

the amphibrach, Vancouver. Though it drones

A tad, the chime would fit a Canadian.

So suffering perplexities as to sound

I dither here, unable to fulfil

Assistance of the kind that would redound

To Canada's credit, unless I channel Will.

Alas, eheu, the bard, three fathoms under,

Prefers, it's said, the silence of his slumber. Nishidani (talk) 09:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

I lived in Central Canada long enough to know that you don't have to be very clever to rhyme Canucks and fucks. I also became quite familiar with the SAQ back East. But thanks for that. I'm a little flattered that you thought I'd know what an amphibrach was. --JGGardiner (talk) 21:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

And you might be interested in the Canadien Stratford Streak. --JGGardiner (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

That's interesting. I must tell Tom Reedy to do a 'Stratford streak' when he next visits England to 'hang out' round Shakespeare's birthplace. I've never heard the word 'Canuck' spoken, and was too lazy to go upstairs for the nth time to yank out, (or is that 'canuck out'?) the 20 vol OED and check it. So we share a common past as SAQs slaking our thirst in Eastern Canada, I see. All I can remember from staying in Toronto was that people put salt in their beer, you couldn't rise from a pub table to order and get tankards but had to be waited on, that if you got closer to the bar, and sat at 'stool' to ease the travail and delays of ordering, you had to look at a pair of tits, and that a local told me these were the dues paid for the country's Protestant roots. Montreal, in those days, seemed to be the only livable city, because alcoholicss like myself were tolerated, and their French patois accents seemed worse than mine was at the time. Nishidani (talk) 08:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Source

You had access to this source, could you look at it and see if it supports the sentence? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 11:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

yes and yes. nableezy - 13:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Arrigoni

Hi, thanks for your message on it.wiki. I'll try to give a look at the ensligh version of the article. Honestlty I think that the current version is not so netural and it should be partially rewritten (but from his structure, this is the problem...). --Lucas (talk) 04:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much, that is very nice of you. nableezy - 05:05, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

"de-gibberishize, what does "between Israel and Palestine" mean?"

I saw your edit in the Itamar attack page. I don't know who wrote the former revision, but it said disputed territory between Israel and Palestine, meaning an area which is in argument between the Israelis and Palestinians. But I do think it is good you erased it, since it doesn't matter whatsoever if there is a dispute over this or that area - killing and slaughtering children and parents is an act of terrorism and a terrible sin.Editorprop (talk) 20:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for sharing? nableezy - 22:19, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I think this comment is literally the other side of the coin. Cheers, – OhioStandard (talk) 23:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Your sig

I should probably have better things to do than to tell you this, but sadly, I don't. Did you know your signature has an unmatched </small> tag at its very end? It gets highlighted as a syntax error in edit mode with the editor I use (wikEd), and my poor ADD brain has me staring at it for two seconds before I remember, "Oh, yeah. That's Nableezy's signature." If the spare trailing tag isn't purposeful (I suppose it could help you find your edits on a busy page, in edit mode) is there any chance you'd take pity on me and my similarly ... wait, was that a bird at the window? I need to wash the car before the trip to the beach ... ADD kindred wikEd users, and delete it? I checked, and your sig shows up just the same without it. – OhioStandard (talk) 23:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Looking at it I think it is an unmatched </font> tag. I took that out now, is there a problem with this signature? nableezy - 01:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Ah, much better. No syntax-error highlights in wikEd. Most kind; thanks! – OhioStandard (talk) 03:59, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi there

The end
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Nableezy, I used to have a slightly better opinion about you. I mean discussing stolen emails (even if they are fake, but you believe them to be real) is anyway as to buy stolen things. Only somebody, who has no dignity could fall so low. Please have a nice day.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC) Thats nice. If you ever have evidence of me colluding with a banned editor who has repeatedly used sock puppets to harass other users, please, by all means, discuss to your hearts content. If I am colluding with that banned user to get you blocked, even better. It must take a lot of "dignity" to do that. nableezy - 13:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC) Nableezy, you say I was proxy editing on behalf of nocal, but I urge you to look over my contribution, and find any instance I was. Never ever ever ever I was editing on behalf of any banned user. Never! I hardly edit old articles at all. I mostly write new ones, and my English cannot be mistaking with English of nocal. So why December 20 was different? It was different because I knew my account was hacked at the very moment it was. After that my friends and me exchanged a few fake emails in order to make the hacker to act on them. How did I know that the hacker was connected to Misplaced Pages? Well, I did not, but the IP my alert gave to me was editing wikipedia. That IP was proxy, but at that time I did not know it was. It looked like it was from Chicago. I thought it could be you, and that's why I edited Egypt between other things. A day or two later I emailed CU about that IP, and it was blocked. CU could confirm my words. I also emailed Phil, and explained the situation with those fake emails, and he could confirm my words. Please stop beating a dead horse, and exercise some dignity. One useful idiot Sol got banned over those emails. Please avoid being next.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC) Fake emails, yeah right. So when you ask Brocollo to approve a DYK and tell him exactly what to write, and with his next edit he does exactly that, that is fake? When you ask NoCal about the Egypt article, and he responds and tells you what to do, and also uses a sockpuppet in that little "game", and you do exactly that, that is fake? When you are coordinating AE filings with nsaum (which I must say made me extremely disappointed in him, I did not expect such blatantly underhanded actions from him), that is fact? When you coordinate with Jiujitsuguy, Stellarkid (a banned user), Breein, and brewcrewer, that is fake? How's this for a game, you leave me alone, and I'll try to forget the fact that you engaged in such sneaky, lowdown, underhanded, punk-made tactics. nableezy - 13:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC) Actually, it is you who should leave me alone, and stop spreading lies about me, the lies that were taken from fake emails, the lies that have already made one useful idiot to be banned.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC) Im on your talk page right now? Nuh uh? Fake emails? Right. And your reply to Demiurge where you acknowledge the NoCal emails as real, same as you do here. Give it up mbz1, you are not as good as you think you are. You cant wiggle your way out of this and every word you write only makes it more clear that all of this is true. Now, be gone. Go cry to your email list, Im sure you all can figure a new article to target together. nableezy - 14:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC) I have never acknowledged my emails are real. Here's the email that he published. Yes, I wrote email to nocal but with the only purpose to make the hacker to act on it and to get caught. --Mbz1 (talk) 14:11, 3 May 2011 (UTC) You acknowledged playing a "game" with NoCal on Egypt when the emails show you working with NoCal on Egypt to attempt to get me blocked. If you dont understand that to be an acknowledgment that the email is real, sorry, I cant help you. But like I said, be gone. Im sure there is much more dignity on the email list with Jiujitsuguy, Stellarkid/Tundrabuggy/Dajudem/tooManyToName, brewcrewer, ... than there is here, so you may be more comfortable there. nableezy - 14:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC) You have both made highly inappropriate comments in this thread. Stop it or you'll both end up getting sanctioned. Gatoclass (talk) 14:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC) Gato, I am tired of your unwarranted threats. You want to get me sanctioned, please be my guest. --Mbz1 (talk) 14:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC) Which comment, the "sneaky, lowdown ..."? Maybe, but it isnt everyday you learn a user is colluding with the likes of NoCal to get you blocked. nableezy - 14:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC) Nab, if you have no dignity left, could you please turn your brain on at least? I am telling you I knew about the hacking at the very moment it happened. Everything after that was a game to make the hacker to act. When the hacker did not act, I thought it could be not connected to wiki after all, and it was when I decided to change my password and emailed CU about the hacker. As you see the IP was blocked on December 23 (actually on December 22 SF time). In my email to Avi I provided the copy of the alert my Gmail gave to me. He could confirm my words. So once again please stop beating a dead horse because you look laughable, and with that I am outtahere --Mbz1 (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC) Do you not understand the words "be gone"? Would you like me to explain them to you? If not, be gone. I dont believe a word you write, in fact I have no doubt that you continue to collude with NoCal, Stellarkid, brewcrewer, Breein .... Tell them I say hi, and let NoCal I know 2 of his current socks. And 1 of Stellarkids. nableezy - 15:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

The end

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Nableezy, I used to have a slightly better opinion about you. I mean discussing stolen emails (even if they are fake, but you believe them to be real) is anyway as to buy stolen things. Only somebody, who has no dignity could fall so low. Please have a nice day.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Thats nice. If you ever have evidence of me colluding with a banned editor who has repeatedly used sock puppets to harass other users, please, by all means, discuss to your hearts content. If I am colluding with that banned user to get you blocked, even better. It must take a lot of "dignity" to do that. nableezy - 13:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Nableezy, you say I was proxy editing on behalf of nocal, but I urge you to look over my contribution, and find any instance I was. Never ever ever ever I was editing on behalf of any banned user. Never! I hardly edit old articles at all. I mostly write new ones, and my English cannot be mistaking with English of nocal. So why December 20 was different? It was different because I knew my account was hacked at the very moment it was. After that my friends and me exchanged a few fake emails in order to make the hacker to act on them. How did I know that the hacker was connected to Misplaced Pages? Well, I did not, but the IP my alert gave to me was editing wikipedia. That IP was proxy, but at that time I did not know it was. It looked like it was from Chicago. I thought it could be you, and that's why I edited Egypt between other things. A day or two later I emailed CU about that IP, and it was blocked. CU could confirm my words. I also emailed Phil, and explained the situation with those fake emails, and he could confirm my words. Please stop beating a dead horse, and exercise some dignity. One useful idiot Sol got banned over those emails. Please avoid being next.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Fake emails, yeah right. So when you ask Brocollo to approve a DYK and tell him exactly what to write, and with his next edit he does exactly that, that is fake? When you ask NoCal about the Egypt article, and he responds and tells you what to do, and also uses a sockpuppet in that little "game", and you do exactly that, that is fake? When you are coordinating AE filings with nsaum (which I must say made me extremely disappointed in him, I did not expect such blatantly underhanded actions from him), that is fact? When you coordinate with Jiujitsuguy, Stellarkid (a banned user), Breein, and brewcrewer, that is fake? How's this for a game, you leave me alone, and I'll try to forget the fact that you engaged in such sneaky, lowdown, underhanded, punk-made tactics. nableezy - 13:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Actually, it is you who should leave me alone, and stop spreading lies about me, the lies that were taken from fake emails, the lies that have already made one useful idiot to be banned.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Im on your talk page right now? Nuh uh? Fake emails? Right. And your reply to Demiurge where you acknowledge the NoCal emails as real, same as you do here. Give it up mbz1, you are not as good as you think you are. You cant wiggle your way out of this and every word you write only makes it more clear that all of this is true. Now, be gone. Go cry to your email list, Im sure you all can figure a new article to target together. nableezy - 14:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

I have never acknowledged my emails are real. Here's the email that he published. Yes, I wrote email to nocal but with the only purpose to make the hacker to act on it and to get caught. --Mbz1 (talk) 14:11, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

You acknowledged playing a "game" with NoCal on Egypt when the emails show you working with NoCal on Egypt to attempt to get me blocked. If you dont understand that to be an acknowledgment that the email is real, sorry, I cant help you. But like I said, be gone. Im sure there is much more dignity on the email list with Jiujitsuguy, Stellarkid/Tundrabuggy/Dajudem/tooManyToName, brewcrewer, ... than there is here, so you may be more comfortable there. nableezy - 14:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

You have both made highly inappropriate comments in this thread. Stop it or you'll both end up getting sanctioned. Gatoclass (talk) 14:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Gato, I am tired of your unwarranted threats. You want to get me sanctioned, please be my guest. --Mbz1 (talk) 14:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Which comment, the "sneaky, lowdown ..."? Maybe, but it isnt everyday you learn a user is colluding with the likes of NoCal to get you blocked. nableezy - 14:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Nab, if you have no dignity left, could you please turn your brain on at least? I am telling you I knew about the hacking at the very moment it happened. Everything after that was a game to make the hacker to act. When the hacker did not act, I thought it could be not connected to wiki after all, and it was when I decided to change my password and emailed CU about the hacker. As you see the IP was blocked on December 23 (actually on December 22 SF time). In my email to Avi I provided the copy of the alert my Gmail gave to me. He could confirm my words. So once again please stop beating a dead horse because you look laughable, and with that I am outtahere --Mbz1 (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Do you not understand the words "be gone"? Would you like me to explain them to you? If not, be gone. I dont believe a word you write, in fact I have no doubt that you continue to collude with NoCal, Stellarkid, brewcrewer, Breein .... Tell them I say hi, and let NoCal I know 2 of his current socks. And 1 of Stellarkids. nableezy - 15:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Fidelity of a translation?

Hi, Nableezy. Am I correct in my understanding that you're conversant in Arabic? If so, I wonder if you'd mind having a look at the video on this page to determine whether it supports the English-language translation that occurs on the same page? It's just a minute and 17 seconds long, and you might be able to save other editors a lot of wrangling at the talk page for the Hamas school bus attack article, if you could find the time to do so. Best thanks, – OhioStandard (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

At work right now, would rather not go to that site from here. Will check it when I get home tonight. nableezy - 16:12, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Of course; I understand. You might also like to look at comments I left about it on Roscelese's talk page re its context. Again, thank you. – OhioStandard (talk) 16:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

The translation aint bad, but the way it was treated in the article is way off. The advisor was saying that Israel wished to use the bus attack as a pretext for attacking Gaza. The focus in the article is the snippet were he says that "which was not completely destroyed". And why would an advisor to a politician be quoted anyway as though this were an official reaction? But Ive said enough, the actual translation aint too bad. nableezy - 00:21, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, very generous of you... But your edit notice always makes me want to insult someone, and I know it would be immature to insult you, gratuitously, after you've just done me a kindness. I know! You wouldn't ban me from your talk page for insulting Wiki-petan, would you? She's such a ... no, I can't bring myself to say it; she's just a kid. Sigh. Anyway, thanks again for your help, very much. – OhioStandard (talk) 10:11, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Judaization of Jerusalem

Not so much on top of the rules, but didn't you violate 1rr?--brew crewer (yada, yada) 20:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

I know you are on top of the rules, which is why you rushed to revert there. But no, reverts of IPs are exempt. See WP:ARBPIA#General 1RR restriction: edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty. But you could email a friend and ask them to revert; so long as they log in I could not revert again ;). nableezy - 20:24, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

apparently you're more on top of the rules then i am. no need to email. my "friends" probably have your talk page watchlisted, will see this discussion, and revert. Then your "friend" will revert my friend and so on and so forth. Unless of course we decided to be a little reasonable and admit that history of Jews in Jerusalem is proper background material for an article entitled Judaization of Jerusalem.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 20:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

All right, I have self reverted. But I expect you to condense it and make it a bit more relevant. Please do so. nableezy - 20:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

I was actually going to add to that section. From what I understand, according to the Bible, the history of Jews in Jerusalem does not start at King David, but earlier. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 20:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

All right, you add to it, then Ill condense it. Please dont make me regret setting aside my better judgment and attempting to work with you. nableezy - 20:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

If you think it has to be condensed, then condense it. I don't take orders from you.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 21:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

All right, back to my better judgment. nableezy - 21:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the interruption; logically, history needs to be sourced by historians, not historical religious scholars whom collected the Biblic scriptures. With my respect, and exception of course, to all of our beloved prophets.

I'm not opening a discussion, tho, just clarifying the reliable source sense of history sources: secondary source. AdvertAdam 22:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Replying to my comment was continued on my talkpage. Sorry for the interruption Nableezy :) AdvertAdam 22:51, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

No worries. nableezy - 23:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

AE

I'm sure you've seen it, but here's your formal notice: Tzu Zha Men (talk) 20:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks NoCal! nableezy - 21:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

You really should publish a guide to the various socks. I wish I had 1/10 of your ability to sniff them out. (I'm fairly certain that Stellarkid is back, but I'm too lazy to bother looking for diffs.) — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 21:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I'd put the odds on Opportunidaddy being a sock of SK around 3-1. When it gets down to 2-1 I might file an SPI. There is another, more active one, that I am pretty sure of, but need to wait a bit for more evidence. nableezy - 21:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm thinking of an editor with a shorter name that starts with S and ends with m. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 21:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't think S----m is a sock. Sean.hoyland - talk 22:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I dont think so either, but that user hasnt really made me aware of them, so I cant say Ive actually looked all that carefully. nableezy - 22:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)