Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Noeleen Hale: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:51, 24 April 2011 editHighKing (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers27,852 edits Noeleen Hale: note← Previous edit Revision as of 12:00, 24 April 2011 edit undoLemonMonday (talk | contribs)568 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
:'''Keep'''. BLP1E is just a guideline, not a hard and fast rule. She's notable enough to have had a book written about her. ] ] 11:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC) :'''Keep'''. BLP1E is just a guideline, not a hard and fast rule. She's notable enough to have had a book written about her. ] ] 11:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
::Honestly LM, why is it that you won't/can't perform even the basic research? For accuracy, she has not had a book written about her. The article does mention a book, but be aware that the the publisher is "Books LLC" and they are known for publishing books based on Misplaced Pages articles and categories - certainly the case here too. Check out the category of "Female Police Officers" on Misplaced Pages and compare to the book.... --] (]) 11:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC) ::Honestly LM, why is it that you won't/can't perform even the basic research? For accuracy, she has not had a book written about her. The article does mention a book, but be aware that the the publisher is "Books LLC" and they are known for publishing books based on Misplaced Pages articles and categories - certainly the case here too. Check out the category of "Female Police Officers" on Misplaced Pages and compare to the book.... --] (]) 11:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
:::Regardless. The only reason you and Bjmullan are here is because the text of the arcticle includes '''British Isles'''. And I notice in the edit history of the article you've had a previous stab at this back in 2008, no doubt for the same reason. ] ] 12:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:00, 24 April 2011

Noeleen Hale

Noeleen Hale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphan article about a living person noted for only this one event. The event fails WP:EVENT and the person fails WP:BIO1E.

Delete not notable, as per WP:BLP1E Catfish Jim & the soapdish 12:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Delete Agree with nom. A single event, and participant was the "human interest" element in the story, arguably not even the main subject of the story. --HighKing (talk)
Delete: Not notable per BLP1E. Scolaire (talk) 11:08, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Keep. BLP1E is just a guideline, not a hard and fast rule. She's notable enough to have had a book written about her. LemonMonday Talk 11:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Honestly LM, why is it that you won't/can't perform even the basic research? For accuracy, she has not had a book written about her. The article does mention a book, but be aware that the the publisher is "Books LLC" and they are known for publishing books based on Misplaced Pages articles and categories - certainly the case here too. Check out the category of "Female Police Officers" on Misplaced Pages and compare to the book.... --HighKing (talk) 11:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Regardless. The only reason you and Bjmullan are here is because the text of the arcticle includes British Isles. And I notice in the edit history of the article you've had a previous stab at this back in 2008, no doubt for the same reason. LemonMonday Talk 12:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Noeleen Hale: Difference between revisions Add topic