Revision as of 17:44, 19 April 2011 editSnowded (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,634 edits Delete obscenity← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:31, 19 April 2011 edit undoLemonMonday (talk | contribs)568 edits →BRDNext edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::I am not interested in your speculation as to the motives of other editors. This is a content issue. There is nothing in the exhibition literature that says the poets were selected as "British Isles", it is thus clearly OR to insert that. Please respond to the content issue with a reference or an argument --] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 17:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC) | :::I am not interested in your speculation as to the motives of other editors. This is a content issue. There is nothing in the exhibition literature that says the poets were selected as "British Isles", it is thus clearly OR to insert that. Please respond to the content issue with a reference or an argument --] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 17:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::: Agree no ref to say selection based on belonging to the British Isles. ]] 17:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC) | :::: Agree no ref to say selection based on belonging to the British Isles. ]] 17:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::: You're not bothered about references, at least you aren't at ], so what gives? Don't answer that, I already know. You and the rest of them are just POV pushing anything to do with British Isles to try and remove the term wherever you can. ] ] 18:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:31, 19 April 2011
BRD
The contemporary artists are from the UK and Ireland, and one was born in South Africa. Inaccurate to describe them as "British Isles" poets, and unreferenced to boot. The NPG refers to these portraits in this way: "led to a one-man show of contemporary poets at the Gallery in 1990". I'll list the artists and their nationality instead. --HighKing (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Concur, no reference to say that the poets were selected as belonging to the British Isles, it just says contemporary. Inserting BI is original research without a reference and there is no excuse for edit warring. --Snowded 16:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Interpretation. This is just an OR claim being used to justify POV. Please list those who are edit warring. LemonMonday Talk 17:00, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- I am not interested in your speculation as to the motives of other editors. This is a content issue. There is nothing in the exhibition literature that says the poets were selected as "British Isles", it is thus clearly OR to insert that. Please respond to the content issue with a reference or an argument --Snowded 17:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Agree no ref to say selection based on belonging to the British Isles. Mo ainm~Talk 17:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- You're not bothered about references, at least you aren't at Neil Robertson (snooker player), so what gives? Don't answer that, I already know. You and the rest of them are just POV pushing anything to do with British Isles to try and remove the term wherever you can. LemonMonday Talk 18:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Agree no ref to say selection based on belonging to the British Isles. Mo ainm~Talk 17:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- I am not interested in your speculation as to the motives of other editors. This is a content issue. There is nothing in the exhibition literature that says the poets were selected as "British Isles", it is thus clearly OR to insert that. Please respond to the content issue with a reference or an argument --Snowded 17:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Interpretation. This is just an OR claim being used to justify POV. Please list those who are edit warring. LemonMonday Talk 17:00, 19 April 2011 (UTC)