| Revision as of 02:46, 12 April 2011 view sourceRacepacket (talk | contribs)16,693 edits →Civility← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:27, 12 April 2011 view source Barts1a (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,763 edits →CivilityNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| :::It is not a matter of dislike. It is a matter of his behavior as seen by the community as a whole. It took them a year and a half to realize he is difficult to work with.—<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 00:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC) | :::It is not a matter of dislike. It is a matter of his behavior as seen by the community as a whole. It took them a year and a half to realize he is difficult to work with.—<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 00:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Perhaps you could withdraw your MfD? I really don't want to edit war with you. As you saw from the last GA review, I deferred to you on the sustainability language. Thanks, ] (]) 02:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC) | ::::Perhaps you could withdraw your MfD? I really don't want to edit war with you. As you saw from the last GA review, I deferred to you on the sustainability language. Thanks, ] (]) 02:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Just weighing in on this whole debacle: I have interacted with Ryulong in the past and have found that he generally reverts ANYTHING that he does not like on his talk page (Heck; he ever reverted this!) whereas I have had to hand in my rollback rights for MUCH less than this! I think that this is (to me) creating a whole double-standard on wikipedia where admins can get away with anything such as using rollback for anything but blatant vandalism while when we mere users do the same ((ab)use rollback for anything but blatant vandalism) we get punished for it. Either the rollback rules need to be enforced either universally slack or universally strict. Just my $0.02 ] | ] | ] 04:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:27, 12 April 2011
| Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page by using either the "new section" tab or this link. |
| Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). If you do not sign your comments, I may remove them entirely. |
| Please keep your comments short and to the point. I do not want to read essays on this page. |
| I will revert and ignore any basic template messages used on my talk page. If you want to talk to me, use your own words. |
| I prefer to keep conversations on one page. If I left a message for you on your user talk page, I prefer to respond to you there. |
| My local time: January 2025 19 Sunday 11:04 am EST |
| Archives
|
|---|
|
When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng
XGather Promo cards
FYI - there's new promo cards listed here (27-30) for translation addition to the list at List of promotional Rangers Strike cards. JPG-GR (talk) 02:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Done.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:27, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Ringo Sheena
I have done this move, fixed no less than fourteen resulting double redirects, and changed "Shiina" to "Sheena" where it seemed appropriate in the early part of the article; can I leave you to check the rest of it? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Will do.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Rebuild of Evangelion Cast
Saw that you removed cast list from Rebuild of Evangelion page. Thought it would be good to recognize voice talent and it would be redundant to have on four separate pages. Your thoughts? Ode2joy (talk) 03:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- The casts are mentioned on all pages unless there is a central character list (which is the case for Eva as far as I am aware).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Civility
A glance at your recent contributions reveals the following breaks of civility:
- "We are not going through this bullshit again."
- Ad hominem: "considering Racepacket's involvement, it will not turn out well."
- Virtually the entire comment, including "I am so intesely tiredof you bullshit attempts to get these pages into good or featured status. There is absolutely no fucking reason why anyone would need to copy the entire code of an article and userfy it during a Good Article nomination."
- Shouting
- "Who the hell ever said…"
- "He takes the most asinine approach to GA nominations…"
You have been chastised multiple times for acts of incivility, including by ArbCom. Please try harder to control your emotions. If nothing else, engaging in uncivil discourse undermines your own image and credibility in the eyes of third parties. —Bill Price (nyb) 00:23, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have lost my patience in dealing with Racepacket over the articles University of Miami and Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science. He has lost any semblance of good faith with me when it comes to editing these articles, particularly after I learned about the copyright issues. If Racepacket cannot be trusted to edit this project without someone watching over his edits to make sure he is not performing copyright violations, why should I use kid gloves when raising issues about it? And again, my use of curse words not directed towards any individual is not going to change any time soon.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- One of the five pillars requires you to "interact in a respectful and civil manner." You are not excused from that obligation just because you dislike someone—that doesn't make any sense. Why would you act uncivilly toward someone you like? —Bill Price (nyb) 00:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is not a matter of dislike. It is a matter of his behavior as seen by the community as a whole. It took them a year and a half to realize he is difficult to work with.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could withdraw your MfD? I really don't want to edit war with you. As you saw from the last GA review, I deferred to you on the sustainability language. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 02:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Just weighing in on this whole debacle: I have interacted with Ryulong in the past and have found that he generally reverts ANYTHING that he does not like on his talk page (Heck; he ever reverted this!) whereas I have had to hand in my rollback rights for MUCH less than this! I think that this is (to me) creating a whole double-standard on wikipedia where admins can get away with anything such as using rollback for anything but blatant vandalism while when we mere users do the same ((ab)use rollback for anything but blatant vandalism) we get punished for it. Either the rollback rules need to be enforced either universally slack or universally strict. Just my $0.02 Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me 04:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could withdraw your MfD? I really don't want to edit war with you. As you saw from the last GA review, I deferred to you on the sustainability language. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 02:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is not a matter of dislike. It is a matter of his behavior as seen by the community as a whole. It took them a year and a half to realize he is difficult to work with.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- One of the five pillars requires you to "interact in a respectful and civil manner." You are not excused from that obligation just because you dislike someone—that doesn't make any sense. Why would you act uncivilly toward someone you like? —Bill Price (nyb) 00:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)