Misplaced Pages

User talk:Seb az86556: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:44, 6 January 2011 editHalfShadow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,876 edits Careful with using 4im right off...← Previous edit Revision as of 05:07, 6 January 2011 edit undo63.131.4.149 (talk) User not attacked: new sectionNext edit →
Line 46: Line 46:
:::Where is the "talking" you received? ] <sup>]</sup> 04:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC) :::Where is the "talking" you received? ] <sup>]</sup> 04:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
:::]. ]] 04:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC) :::]. ]] 04:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

== User not attacked ==

He called me names, it's the other way around. Your good ol' boy system is coming to an end. You are all being recorded and reported for Wiki improvements and reconsideration of free editing. Be careful. I'm out! Oh, and mind your own business. If anything, he should be warned. I was harrassed, I was attacked. Leaving warnings on my page to make me look bad and create a consensus to block me is very immature. How do you know the creator of Wiki doesn't come on here to see how you "show boaters" are behaving?? You "chill". ] (]) 05:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:07, 6 January 2011

earlier on this program...
(archives)
(+)

2009

15255    july 2009
49597    august 2009
12718    september 2009
6884    october 2009
20650    november 2009
27742    december 2009

2010

38848    january 2010
31594    february 2010
18754    march 2010
14511    april 2010
18480    may 2010
9998    june 2010
13864    july 2010
17597    august 2010
6479    september 2010
12322    october 2010
22341    november 2010
6914    december 2010

2011

27363    january 2011
15692    february 2011
16618    march 2011
12744    april 2011
9267    may 2011
5866    june 2011
13911    july 2011
4768    august 2011
4600    september 2011
5340    october 2011
13038    november 2011
15661    december 2011

2012

5527    january 2012
6684    february 2012
6179    march 2012
7290    april 2012
8723    may 2012
10438    june 2012
5929    july 2012
7638    august 2012
14328    september 2012
16008    october 2012
9891    november 2012
1822    december 2012

2013

12285    january 2013
8185    february 2013
18650    march 2013
6264    april 2013
Editing of this talk page by unregistered users is not allowed because choosing to edit without logging into an account creates a power imbalance in communication. All such edits will be reverted without comment.

Unless you have a static IP, you are purposely preventing other editors from observing patterns in your editing behavior as well as purposely choosing not to have a permanent place where other editors may reliably communicate with you about those behaviors. If you are allowed to make this choice, then I choose to rectify this imbalance by ignoring you.

If you truly wish to communicate as equals, please create an account and become an established editor. Thank you.

If it says what I'm guessing it says...

I don't get much of it, but could you read this and give me your one or 2 cents? thanks... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 15:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

It's on the US of A, literally "Land of the Americans". It calls itself a stub article, and indeed, it is. It gives a brief rundown of the history, starting from the point that today mainly descendants of European immigrants lived there, who had exstinguished most natives, had held deterred Africans as slaves, had become rich from their labour. While not doing that any more, they were still the richmost land on earth, ruling some other parts of it by forces of economy and occasional wars mostly now in Asia. Its inhabitants regarded themselves the most important folks somewhere between god and the rest of mankind and certainly above the pope (here you have to know that this is somewhat reminiscent of several local stories and legends and carries a connotation of self-irony: Hey, they can be as bold as we!) They called themselves Christians but their "pope" was called "president" and elected in a somewhat democratic looking way, where one needs huge amounts of money to spent to have a chance. Last, a superficial parallel is drawn between the "old world" role of the Roman Empire which brought culture "to us", and the current role of the USA in the world. That's about it. Greetings --Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 19:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Hm... that sounds a bit tuned down from what I understood... I trust you think that stuff is OK to write... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 04:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Well, it's (imho) at the brink of deserving a "not objective or impartial enough" QA sticker. Since we have no writers taking care of those on a regular basis, I've put it on my agenda to improve the article adding simple base facts on the country at least. --Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 03:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes, thank you; unfortunately, I am only fluent in Afrikaans, so I find myself unable to write anything in Kölsch, though I understand quite a bit. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 03:44, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Just the opposite with me :-) I am fluent in Kölsch and reading Afrikaans pretty well, regarding the fact that I never learned it, but am unable to write or speak it. --Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

DREAM Act

I want to hear that why do you remove the correct information. My information about the voting result and immigration process are true, but you comment it is destruction. Currently the DREAM Act aritle is not the voice of all in the Misplaced Pages:Twinkle because I add the information. Also What you do mean "nope" on your editing comment? Woonhocho (talk) 07:01, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Partial revert; please provide references, and write better English. thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 08:30, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

My edit of Arizona

How do you think that a edit that says "THERE WILL BE A COUP AGAINST JAN BREWER AND THE STATE GOVERNMENT IN THE COMING MONTHS"is a good edit.TucsonDavid GOD BLESS THE U.S.A. 11:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Exactly. You tell me, since you're the one who made it. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 11:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Well I see you Can't or won't give a straight answer.TucsonDavid GOD BLESS THE U.S.A. 11:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

How is that not a straight answer? I gave you the diff, the diff clearly shows vandalism. Next time, look before you leap. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 11:56, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Actually it was not vandalism per se I admit I was wrong I'm guess I m to tired and when I saw "THERE WILL BE A COUP AGAINST JAN BREWER AND THE STATE GOVERNMENT IN THE COMING MONTHS" and a ip edit i guess I hit revert a little to fast. We both forgot to http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith, well sorry will be more careful in the future.TucsonDavid GOD BLESS THE U.S.A. 12:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
I would've assumed good faith if this had been your first screw-up; it wasn't. Your "mistakes" are numerous. You alone are responsible for your edits, and cannot hide behind some good-faith stuff anymore. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 12:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Had you told me of my error I would of reverted my edit I may not be a editor with 1000's of edits but getting alot better but I don't think I have made tons of mistakes.TucsonDavid GOD BLESS THE U.S.A. 12:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Hey, Seb

Thanks for your help at my user talk. See ya 'round Tiderolls 04:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Careful with using 4im right off...

...I got a talking to for using one the day before. Unless it's a sock or something. HalfShadow 04:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Obvious IP-hoppers, a.k.a. socks Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 04:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
S'alright then. HalfShadow 04:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Where is the "talking" you received? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 04:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Here. HalfShadow 04:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

User not attacked

He called me names, it's the other way around. Your good ol' boy system is coming to an end. You are all being recorded and reported for Wiki improvements and reconsideration of free editing. Be careful. I'm out! Oh, and mind your own business. If anything, he should be warned. I was harrassed, I was attacked. Leaving warnings on my page to make me look bad and create a consensus to block me is very immature. How do you know the creator of Wiki doesn't come on here to see how you "show boaters" are behaving?? You "chill". 63.131.4.149 (talk) 05:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Seb az86556: Difference between revisions Add topic