| Revision as of 12:50, 13 December 2010 view sourceSeikoEn (talk | contribs)474 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:31, 13 December 2010 view source MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 8 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise/Archive 21.Next edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| You are invited to participate in the ''']''' which is expected to close in a little over a week. If you have received this message, it is because it appears that you participated in ], and your contributions indicate that you are currently active on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 26 October 2010 (UTC) | You are invited to participate in the ''']''' which is expected to close in a little over a week. If you have received this message, it is because it appears that you participated in ], and your contributions indicate that you are currently active on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 26 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Merge discussion for ] == | |||
| ] An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been proposed for a ] with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going {{ #if: |]|to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article}}, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. --] (]) 15:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC) <!-- Template:mergenote --> | |||
| == Kosmas Thesprotos == | |||
| I'm extremely sorry for leaving such a message in your talkpage, because you don't like such issues but unfortunately this is the only thing I can do to effectively deal with people who refuse to accept plain facts(and there's nothing else I can do apart from asking from people who are familiar with these issues for their own personal input). On ], Alexikoua has been insisting that the person was born in a village of modern Albania, but apparently official Greek sources disagree with him saying that he was born in a village with a similar name that existed in modern Anatoli municipality of Greece , but as you know Alexikoua will keep insisting based on a blog post that somehow he was born in Albania or that there's no Anatoli municipality in Greece(for which there's an article on the Greek wikipedia).--<span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 14:18, 2 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please contribute to the discussion thread . --] (]) 22:58, 5 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : It is pointless when an administrator fails to explain -- especially when there is evidence of explicit, reasonable, and repeated requests for help in understanding. There is an implicit administrator obligation to participate in a ] when it is coupled with the edit history here. If not, why not? --] (]) 00:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: I gave you repeated explanations. It is not my fault if I cannot make it plain enough for you to understand. ] ] 00:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::Please try again to explain using different words. The search for consensus is thwarted by non-response in this context. Your actions were too hasty, premature. This is neccessary even if your view of this situation is entirely correct, and we are simply misunderstanding. What seems obvious to you is not obvious. --] (]) 00:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == December 2010 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users who ] or refuse to ] with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the ] states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the ] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains ] among editors. If unsuccessful, then '''do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. Post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] ] 00:12, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{talkback|Barts1a}} | |||
| {{talkback|Barts1a}} | |||
| == Better source request for File:Bouboulina.JPG == | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the ] status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the ''exact'' source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. | |||
| If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . If you have any questions please ask them at the ] or me at my talk page. Thank you. ] (]) 01:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] missing description details == | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;">'''Dear uploader:''' The media file you uploaded as ] is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. | |||
| If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, | |||
| a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. | |||
| If you have any questions please see ]. Thank you. ] (]) 01:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Add-desc --> | |||
| == ] needs authorship information. == | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;">'''Dear uploader:''' | |||
| The media file you uploaded as ] is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) | |||
| , or if such information is provided it is confusing. | |||
| Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, | |||
| such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image. | |||
| If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer. | |||
| If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the {{tl|own}} template on the media information page. | |||
| If you have any questions please see ]. Thank you. ] (]) 01:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Add-author --> | |||
| == User:Janu baba == | |||
| Please see my comments at ]. I don't think a final warning is enough here. ] (]) 10:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Line 120: | Line 62: | ||
| I honestly don't know why I bother leaving messages on the talk pages of IP addresses at times. I've only received a response once, and that's because they both have accounts but don't edit logged in all the time. The IP that Barts1a removed my warnings to has continued the disruptive editing, and aside from protecting the article (which won't happen because it has been consistently perceived as a conflict dispute rather than a user adding in false information), I don't know hwo to get these edits to stop. It does not require a talk page discussion, because obviously the IP doesn't know that the talk pages exist.—] (]) 06:14, 8 December 2010 (UTC) | I honestly don't know why I bother leaving messages on the talk pages of IP addresses at times. I've only received a response once, and that's because they both have accounts but don't edit logged in all the time. The IP that Barts1a removed my warnings to has continued the disruptive editing, and aside from protecting the article (which won't happen because it has been consistently perceived as a conflict dispute rather than a user adding in false information), I don't know hwo to get these edits to stop. It does not require a talk page discussion, because obviously the IP doesn't know that the talk pages exist.—] (]) 06:14, 8 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ==Your Wisdom has been Noted== | == Your Wisdom has been Noted == | ||
| I just wanted to let you know that one of your comments has been included ''(and attributed to you)'' as part of my ''']'''. Thanks, and if you object then let me know :o) ] ] (]) 07:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC) | I just wanted to let you know that one of your comments has been included ''(and attributed to you)'' as part of my ''']'''. Thanks, and if you object then let me know :o) ] ] (]) 07:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 143: | Line 86: | ||
| == Please check article about Ukrainians == | == Please check article about Ukrainians == | ||
| Sorry for any inconvenience, but please check the work of several users when it comes to a site about Ukrainians and Ukrainian culture in general. Results of several users are evident example of intolerance towards Ukrainians and their culture. Users do not use facts and sources and they also deliberately deleted relevant sources. I think that such work is a shame for Misplaced Pages. Administrators should particularly pay attention on hidden fascism of several users with completly antiukrainian sentiment and their usles interpretations. History of Russia and Ukraine is specialy not objectiv. Incompetent users often delete all traces of the existence of ] in Russian history and often does not allow others to engage in the work of the development of Misplaced Pages. I believe in honest and professional work but when I read articles about Ukrainians I realy dont see it. I hope you'll make an exception and help to remove abusers of Misplaced Pages when it comes to the articles about Ukrainians. Best regards! --] (]) 12:48, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | Sorry for any inconvenience, but please check the work of several users when it comes to a site about Ukrainians and Ukrainian culture in general. Results of several users are evident example of intolerance towards Ukrainians and their culture. Users do not use facts and sources and they also deliberately deleted relevant sources. I think that such work is a shame for Misplaced Pages. Administrators should particularly pay attention on hidden fascism of several users with completly antiukrainian sentiment and their usles interpretations. History of Russia and Ukraine is specialy not objectiv. Incompetent users often delete all traces of the existence of ] in Russian history and often does not allow others to engage in the work of the development of Misplaced Pages. I believe in honest and professional work but when I read articles about Ukrainians I realy dont see it. I hope you'll make an exception and help to remove abusers of Misplaced Pages when it comes to the articles about Ukrainians. Best regards! --] (]) 12:48, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:31, 13 December 2010
 Archives |
|---|
Note: If you leave a message here I will most often respond here
User:Bertport
Hi, Future Perfect at Sunrise. Since you blocked twice my access to English wiki, I have no choice but contact you anonymously. Firstly, I want to express my deepest regret and disaffection for the two blockages. How could people jump to a judgement only by listening to one side's words? Don't you know the villain always sues his victim before he himself is prosecuted. It's User:Bertport who made the very first revert at 00:19, 19 February 2010 while I, mainly with User:Clemensmarabu, had been contributing days to the article Tibet. I never see he does any constructive edit but only undoes others' contributions or stealthily stuffs his biased words.
I waited one week to finally edit the article, if you please have a look at what content is restored , you'll tell at once good from bad. Both sides' opinions are presented and historical events are scholarly argued, thus I wonder where come from the courage of Bertport to revert such an edit and his boldness to accuse others anticipately. Regards. -- LaGrandefr
Watch out
See this. Not another interest party flood. Just a heads up ;) Michi
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Could you "semi-protect" the Istanbul article for the time being from anonymous users. It is constantly attacked and vandalized. I have never seen such constant onslaught on a city article.
Could you "semi-protect" the Istanbul article for the time being from anonymous users. It is constantly attacked and vandalized. I have checked the history of editions and I have never seen such constant referenceless changes and attacks on a city article in Misplaced Pages, I have never seen such constant onslaught on a city article, not even hotly contested Jerusalem comes close! Any contribution one makes is either changed with no explanation or erased altogether.
Even the climate section I (currently) last edited, has been previously constantly changed with no reason and attacked. Even this section seems to be a "hot political issue"!
I am a new user orginally from Turkish Misplaced Pages and try to base the editions I make on credible sources.
Thank you if you could protect this articles for more well meaning users for a while.
Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure
You are invited to participate in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure which is expected to close in a little over a week. If you have received this message, it is because it appears that you participated in the 2009 AC RfC, and your contributions indicate that you are currently active on Misplaced Pages. Ncmvocalist (talk) 26 October 2010 (UTC)
User:Tenmei
I deleted File:Yeonpyeong_smoke_Nov2010.jpg because Tenmei uploaded over the original file, what appeared to be another version of the AP photograph, which he had taken from some blog or other, and he licensed it as PD (so the deletion was for bad license rather than bad FUR). I didn't get time to put that info in the deletion discussion before AnomieBot archived it. I have not blocked him...yet, but if he uploads any more non-free images with ridiculous FURs I might, and if he uploads that image again, I will. He can spend the time reading our image policies. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing to do with my participation in our Misplaced Pages project justifies ridicule. "Ridiculous" is word with meaning. --Tenmei (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Helpful vs unhelpful
Re: Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2010 December 4
Please see comment here --Tenmei (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Please see edit summary here --Tenmei (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Please see diff here. --Tenmei (talk) 06:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Barts1a
Thank you for using a trout on this guy. It was only last week that this guy mistakenly believed that an article I wrote was not notable for inclusion because all of its references were of Japanese origin.
I honestly don't know why I bother leaving messages on the talk pages of IP addresses at times. I've only received a response once, and that's because they both have accounts but don't edit logged in all the time. The IP that Barts1a removed my warnings to has continued the disruptive editing, and aside from protecting the article (which won't happen because it has been consistently perceived as a conflict dispute rather than a user adding in false information), I don't know hwo to get these edits to stop. It does not require a talk page discussion, because obviously the IP doesn't know that the talk pages exist.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:14, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Your Wisdom has been Noted
I just wanted to let you know that one of your comments has been included (and attributed to you) as part of my Nuggets of Wiki Wisdom . Thanks, and if you object then let me know :o) Redthoreau -- (talk) 07:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Dale Robertson pic
A standing ovation to you on your close of Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2010 November 25#File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg. It addressed all the arguments beautifully, though I'd almost put money on it ending up at Deletion Review within the next week. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:15, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Second request
I see my first request to have a sanction lifted has been archived. I would like to request again that the sanction on me here be lifted. If this is something you don't have the time or inclination to deal with please let me know. Thanks very much for your consideration.(olive (talk) 23:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC))
- Sorry for not answering sooner. I wanted to see what happened with the AE request. I still have some reservations about the kind of editing atmosphere I am seeing on those pages, but since apparently some of the other editors feel that your participation has been significantly better than that of some others, and now that ESL has been excluded for a while, I guess we can give it a try . Needless to say, I would still recommend being very careful about reverting. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
What's wrong with this picture?
Hi,
I fail to understand why you have repeatedly removed an image from 2010 Nobel Peace Prize which was being used on grounds of 'historically significant fair use'. I would have agreed to its removal had there been BLP issues, but the article is not a bio, and there are no GFDL images available.. I believe that the image of the ceremony falls within that category of use, and that absence of same is detrimental to the article. --Ohconfucius 04:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- I only removed that image once so far, but I stand by my assessment. It has nothing at all to do with BLP, but with WP:NFCC. It is purely decorative, not itself the object of sourced discussion, and not needed for understanding the article; hence, it fails NFCC#8. It also lacks a meaningful fair-use rationale. "Of historical record" is not a meaningful criterion in NFC issues. I'll leave it open for the moment to what extent the BBC counts as a commercial news agency in the sense of WP:CSD F7 (do they make money by re-licensing their images to others?) In that case, using the image would be totally and immediately out, and subject to immediate speedy deletion. For now, I'll take it to FFD. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Please check article about Ukrainians
Sorry for any inconvenience, but please check the work of several users when it comes to a site about Ukrainians and Ukrainian culture in general. Results of several users are evident example of intolerance towards Ukrainians and their culture. Users do not use facts and sources and they also deliberately deleted relevant sources. I think that such work is a shame for Misplaced Pages. Administrators should particularly pay attention on hidden fascism of several users with completly antiukrainian sentiment and their usles interpretations. History of Russia and Ukraine is specialy not objectiv. Incompetent users often delete all traces of the existence of Ukrainians in Russian history and often does not allow others to engage in the work of the development of Misplaced Pages. I believe in honest and professional work but when I read articles about Ukrainians I realy dont see it. I hope you'll make an exception and help to remove abusers of Misplaced Pages when it comes to the articles about Ukrainians. Best regards! --SeikoEn (talk) 12:48, 13 December 2010 (UTC)