| Revision as of 09:17, 26 September 2010 editBad edits r dumb (talk | contribs)646 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Samantha Spiegel. (TW) | Revision as of 09:44, 26 September 2010 edit undoBad edits r dumb (talk | contribs)646 edits author of article claims to be the subjectNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{Find sources|Samantha Spiegel}}) | :({{Find sources|Samantha Spiegel}}) | ||
| The subject seems to fail basic notability tests. The sources to do not seem to show she's noteworthy. Moreover, this seems to be a potentially significant BLP problem because of the sensitive, arguably lurid subject matter and allegations (e.g. that she was involved in a "sex cult") ] (]) 09:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | The subject seems to fail basic notability tests. The sources to do not seem to show she's noteworthy. Moreover, this seems to be a potentially significant BLP problem because of the sensitive, arguably lurid subject matter and allegations (e.g. that she was involved in a "sex cult") ] (]) 09:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :NOTE: The author of the article . Not sure how or whether we would verify something like this, but if it's true, this poses ] and NPOV issues. If false, this makes the BLP violations all the worse.--] (]) 09:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:44, 26 September 2010
Samantha Spiegel
- Samantha Spiegel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject seems to fail basic notability tests. The sources to do not seem to show she's noteworthy. Moreover, this seems to be a potentially significant BLP problem because of the sensitive, arguably lurid subject matter and allegations (e.g. that she was involved in a "sex cult") Bad edits r dumb (talk) 09:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- NOTE: The author of the article claims to be Spiegel herself. Not sure how or whether we would verify something like this, but if it's true, this poses COI and NPOV issues. If false, this makes the BLP violations all the worse.--Bad edits r dumb (talk) 09:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)