| Revision as of 17:40, 16 August 2010 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,301 edits →Reported to AN3RR: rp← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:33, 20 August 2010 edit undoInaMaka (talk | contribs)4,345 edits →Sockpuppetry caseNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 15:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC) | Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 15:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :::Just for the record this so-called sockpuppet case turned out to be a revenge play by the Wikipedian who made the claim. NOTHING came out of the case and it was summarily shot down, showing the pettiness of the whole incident in the first place.--] (]) 01:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Reported to AN3RR== | ==Reported to AN3RR== | ||
Revision as of 01:33, 20 August 2010
| This is InaMaka's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives | |
Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello
|
You are invited to participate in WikiProject Houston, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about the Greater Houston area. |
Mike Pompeo
Please do not keep removing the sourced information about Pompeo's recent blog controversy. This controversy has gained national attention: , probably more so than any other news story involving Pompeo. It's certainly not undue weight, nor is it POV (as you claimed repeatedly) to simply mention that there has been a controversy. POV would be saying something like "Pompeo linked to a racist blog post; therefore he's a racist and so is anyone who votes for him". That's not what the paragraph in question said, it merely mentioned that there has been a national controversy about Pompeo's Twitter/Facebook posting. It would be irresponsible of us not to mention the controversy when, as I said, this controversy is the reason Pompeo has gotten national attention. I understand that you created Pompeo's article and so might feel "protective" of it, but you should also read WP: OWN; just because you created an article doesn't mean that you "own" it or have the right to decide what should and shouldn't go in it. Stonemason89 (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- This discussion belongs on the talk page of Pompeo, not here. It is inappropriate to place it here.--InaMaka (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/InaMaka for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Stonemason89 (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Just for the record this so-called sockpuppet case turned out to be a revenge play by the Wikipedian who made the claim. NOTHING came out of the case and it was summarily shot down, showing the pettiness of the whole incident in the first place.--InaMaka (talk) 01:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Reported to AN3RR
Please see the relevant thread here: . Stonemason89 (talk) 17:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 17:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)