| Revision as of 20:38, 28 June 2010 editAmorymeltzer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators63,405 edits Climate change moving to workshop← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:38, 28 June 2010 edit undoTasty monster (talk | contribs)1,023 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| This Arbitration case is now moving into the Workshop phase. Please read ] to understand the process. Editors should avoid adding to their evidence sections outside of slight tweaks to aid in understanding; large-scale additions should not be made. Many proposals have already been made and there has already been extensive discussion on them, so please keep the Arbitrators' procedures in mind, namely to keep "''workshop proposals as concise as reasonably possible''." Workshop proposals should be relevant and based on already provided evidence; evidence masquerading as proposals will likely be ignored. ~ <font color="#F09">Amory</font><font color="#555"><small> ''(] • ] • ])''</small></font> 20:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | This Arbitration case is now moving into the Workshop phase. Please read ] to understand the process. Editors should avoid adding to their evidence sections outside of slight tweaks to aid in understanding; large-scale additions should not be made. Many proposals have already been made and there has already been extensive discussion on them, so please keep the Arbitrators' procedures in mind, namely to keep "''workshop proposals as concise as reasonably possible''." Workshop proposals should be relevant and based on already provided evidence; evidence masquerading as proposals will likely be ignored. ~ <font color="#F09">Amory</font><font color="#555"><small> ''(] • ] • ])''</small></font> 20:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : Yes, conceivably. Perhaps a discrete message from me to the committee in email might have created less needless fuss. It isn't as if they didn't already know what the case is about. ] (=] ) 22:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:38, 28 June 2010
Please refer all comments to the talk page of my main account, User talk:Tony Sidaway
Climate change moving to Workshop
This Arbitration case is now moving into the Workshop phase. Please read Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration#Workshop to understand the process. Editors should avoid adding to their evidence sections outside of slight tweaks to aid in understanding; large-scale additions should not be made. Many proposals have already been made and there has already been extensive discussion on them, so please keep the Arbitrators' procedures in mind, namely to keep "workshop proposals as concise as reasonably possible." Workshop proposals should be relevant and based on already provided evidence; evidence masquerading as proposals will likely be ignored. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, conceivably. Perhaps a discrete message from me to the committee in email might have created less needless fuss. It isn't as if they didn't already know what the case is about. Tasty monster (=TS ) 22:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)