| Revision as of 02:44, 22 May 2010 editBcs09 (talk | contribs)988 edits →Nilgiri class ships: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:29, 23 May 2010 edit undoNirvana888 (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,882 edits →Re List of states with nuclear weapons: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| I had opened a to discuss the matter. So if you have sources to provide, lets discuss it and then remove the ships. But until now, there is no information on the ships getting decommissioned. ] (]) 02:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | I had opened a to discuss the matter. So if you have sources to provide, lets discuss it and then remove the ships. But until now, there is no information on the ships getting decommissioned. ] (]) 02:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Re List of states with nuclear weapons == | |||
| Hi I reverted your edit because I thought it might be adding too much detail to a basic table outlining states with nuclear weapons and estimated stockpile numbers. However, I am not fundamentally opposed to the new details. I am of course aware of the difference between strategic and non-strategic (tactical) nuclear weapons. We had previously listed operational/total warheads and the other columns in table would provide further clarification. I though would appreciate if you could start a discussion in the talk page and obtain consensus because making a major change to the table that has been there for months. ] (]) 02:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:29, 23 May 2010
 Archives |
Welcome to Recon.Army's Discussion page
Hello and welcome, I am Recon.Army, please take a look at my User page of you have the time. Please note that I do not accept any Vandalism and/or insulting messages and that such messages will be removed. Don't forget to sign your messages with 4 tildes. Recon.Army (talk) 16:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
List of Aircraft in the IAF
Hello again, Just wanted to let you know that another user has modified the numbers for combat aircraft in the IAF. I left a message on his talk page suggesting that he not change too many of the aircraft service numbers so that the majority of the numbers come from the MilAviaPress article and not from an assortment of various sources which would return the article to its previous state. Vedant (talk) 02:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Makes sense, no doubt some of the aircraft have been retired or have been lost in accidents. By the way, if you ever want to source fleet numbers, check out this E-book on AviationWeek. It's pretty helpful. Vedant (talk) 15:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, in case you're free, one article that really needs major rework is the PLAAF. The entire section contains a ton of unsourced information and features inaccurate inventory numbers. Looking at MilAviaPress, Globalsecurity.org and the E-book from AW, none of the numbers match up and it's clear that there is a LOT of work that needs to be done there. I'm currently a little busy in the real world so I don't know whether I can do a complete overhaul of an article, but that's on my To-do list for now. Vedant (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- I see you're also having some differences of opinion with User:Bcs09 with regards to the fleet size of the Indian Navy. Technically Bcs09 is right however as three Nilgiri class ships are still in service with the Indian Navy. According to Globalsecurity, they are to be decommissioned in 2009, 2010, and 2011 (one ship per-year). However, this hasn't happened yet. (See ). Thanks, Vedant (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Nilgiri class ships
I had opened a to discuss the matter. So if you have sources to provide, lets discuss it and then remove the ships. But until now, there is no information on the ships getting decommissioned. Bcs09 (talk) 02:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Re List of states with nuclear weapons
Hi I reverted your edit because I thought it might be adding too much detail to a basic table outlining states with nuclear weapons and estimated stockpile numbers. However, I am not fundamentally opposed to the new details. I am of course aware of the difference between strategic and non-strategic (tactical) nuclear weapons. We had previously listed operational/total warheads and the other columns in table would provide further clarification. I though would appreciate if you could start a discussion in the talk page and obtain consensus because making a major change to the table that has been there for months. Nirvana888 (talk) 02:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)