| Revision as of 20:43, 8 May 2010 edit45g (talk | contribs)1,140 edits ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:14, 8 May 2010 edit undoLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,650 edits →Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing for repeated ]. Please stop. You are welcome to ] after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> If you are unrelated to the accounts noted at the SPI case, you are wrong to blank such details. If you are indeed related to the accounts noted at the SPI case, then you are very wrong in quite a few different ways to blank the content over issues of privacy. The 24 hour tariff is so you can comment from this account, in an appropriate manner, if you desire (and the autoblock would expire and you could create a sock - it if is "you" - anyway.) ] (]) 22:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:14, 8 May 2010
Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. If you are unrelated to the accounts noted at the SPI case, you are wrong to blank such details. If you are indeed related to the accounts noted at the SPI case, then you are very wrong in quite a few different ways to blank the content over issues of privacy. The 24 hour tariff is so you can comment from this account, in an appropriate manner, if you desire (and the autoblock would expire and you could create a sock - it if is "you" - anyway.) LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)