| Revision as of 02:30, 26 March 2010 editFlightTime (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors157,893 edits →Notification: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:43, 26 March 2010 edit undoGoRight (talk | contribs)6,435 edits →WP:PITCHFORKSNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| At this point, I feel that greater community input concerning your editing history and the concerns of others is needed. I have started a discussion here. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks. ] 01:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC) | At this point, I feel that greater community input concerning your editing history and the concerns of others is needed. I have started a discussion here. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks. ] 01:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : I have responded there per your request. --] (]) 01:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC) | : I have responded there per your request. --] (]) 01:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| === Discussion of the points raised === | |||
| I have no reason whatsoever to doubt Trusilver's good faith, so I must admit to being somewhat surprised by some of his characterizations of the edits he provides. So let me seek input on them one at a time. | |||
| ==== First diff ==== | |||
| The background on this edit is as follows: | |||
| # Some time back Atmoz had indicated on his talk page that he was withdrawing from climate change topics ( is the edit where I was made aware of it), | |||
| # A new process was proposed at the page, | |||
| # Atmoz made that would have been covered by that new process, | |||
| # An editor complained and what they felt was a personal attack and , | |||
| # I made a neutral comment , and | |||
| # I followed up with a on his talk page to make sure he was aware of the new policy since I thought there might be a reasonable probability that he hadn't seen it previously. | |||
| So I was honestly trying to be helpful in terms of making sure Atmoz was aware of what was happening at the Climate Change RfE. I didn't prod him, I didn't take sides, I simply provided him information he might need to know. I had no way to know that he didn't care about the probation policy discussion, but once he made that clear I didn't bother him further. So please help me understand how this is harassment, when I have been told that things are no big deal? --] (]) 02:43, 26 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification == | == Notification == | ||
Revision as of 02:43, 26 March 2010
 | GoRight anticipates being busy in real life for a few weeks and so he may be slow to respond. Updated: 20:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC) |
Historical References
Historical Back Pointers
Rather than create archive pages which use up additional space I have decided to instead keep a list of back pointers to permanent links within the history of this talk page at various points in time.
A Hint
Don't repost there. If further steps are needed, go to a neutral venue or ask a neutral party to mediate (probably best to find somebody besides me). Cheers, Jehochman 15:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. I don't know why this should be a sensitive topic. Either he considers us involved, or not. I believe that he considers us uninvolved based on his comments at Trusilver's talk page but I just want to know where we stand. I don't even care which way he answers, I just want something on record to avoid arguing about it later if the topic ever comes up again. Ironically, he recently told me that if I have an issue with someone the first place to go is to their talk page. So, I took his advice. --GoRight (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have a suggestion for what an appropriate venue might be? I ask because I feel as though I need to walk on egg shells sometimes even for a straight forward question such as this. I don't want to make waves here, I just want an answer that will stick. --GoRight (talk) 16:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
WP:PITCHFORKS
At this point, I feel that greater community input concerning your editing history and the concerns of others is needed. I have started a discussion here. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks. Trusilver 01:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have responded there per your request. --GoRight (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Discussion of the points raised
I have no reason whatsoever to doubt Trusilver's good faith, so I must admit to being somewhat surprised by some of his characterizations of the edits he provides. So let me seek input on them one at a time.
First diff
The background on this edit is as follows:
- Some time back Atmoz had indicated on his talk page that he was withdrawing from climate change topics (this is the edit where I was made aware of it),
- A new process was proposed at the this discussion climate probation request for enforcement page,
- Atmoz made an edit that would have been covered by that new process,
- An editor complained and asked Atmoz to redact what they felt was a personal attack and Atmoz deleted the complaint,
- I made a neutral comment informing Atmoz of the new policy, and
- I followed up with a friendly FYI on his talk page to make sure he was aware of the new policy since I thought there might be a reasonable probability that he hadn't seen it previously.
So I was honestly trying to be helpful in terms of making sure Atmoz was aware of what was happening at the Climate Change RfE. I didn't prod him, I didn't take sides, I simply provided him information he might need to know. I had no way to know that he didn't care about the probation policy discussion, but once he made that clear I didn't bother him further. So please help me understand how this is harassment, when I have been told that things like this are no big deal? --GoRight (talk) 02:43, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Notification
I just want to make a statement at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I just stumbled across the discussion scanned some of it and want to make a statement. Good luck Mlpearc MESSAGE 02:30, 26 March 2010 (UTC)