Revision as of 04:09, 2 February 2010 editNiteshift36 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,778 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:13, 2 February 2010 edit undoNiteshift36 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,778 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Calling an editor a douch is not being "perfectly cool". It is a personal attack and the warning is appropriate. ] (]) 04:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | *Calling an editor a douch is not being "perfectly cool". It is a personal attack and the warning is appropriate. ] (]) 04:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
**The warning is appropriate. If you'd like to take it to ], I'll be more than happy to. ] (]) 04:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | **The warning is appropriate. If you'd like to take it to ], I'll be more than happy to. ] (]) 04:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Keep telling yourself that. If that is the most constructive thing you have to say, I'll presume we're done with this conversation. ] (]) 04:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:13, 2 February 2010
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:TheJazzDalek. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Calling an editor a douch is not being "perfectly cool". It is a personal attack and the warning is appropriate. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- The warning is appropriate. If you'd like to take it to WP:WQA, I'll be more than happy to. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep telling yourself that. If that is the most constructive thing you have to say, I'll presume we're done with this conversation. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC)