Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:42, 24 September 2009

For the denial and distortion of well-established historical facts see Historical revisionism (negationism).

This article needs attention from an expert in History. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. WikiProject History may be able to help recruit an expert. (September 2009)

Template:Wikify is deprecated. Please use a more specific cleanup template as listed in the documentation.

A designation in American history which includes Gabriel Kolko, William Appleman Williams, Gar Alperovitz, Walter LaFeber, Howard Zinn and others. The distinction appears to have been introduced into American historiography shortly after World War I (about 1920) to categorize American historians who questioned the alleged "war guilt" to which Germany was subjected for allegedly being responsible for starting said war.

The expression revisionist also refers to American historians of the 1960's mostly, who criticized the orthodox history of the Cold War which made the West, especially the United States, substantially blameless.

It is not known whether these historians themselves produced a distinct historiography. Nevertheless, at least one scholarly work portrays them as constituting a "school."

Subsequently, a group commonly known as holocaust deniers have persisted in calling themselves also revisionists, or revisionist historians, and there is, as a result, confusion.

History of the categorization

According to Deborah Lipstadt, certain American historians were concerned over the involvement of the United States in World War I. These highly regarded scholars called themselves revisionist. The distinction was effectively drawn in 1920 when Sidney B. Fay, a Smith College professor published a collection of articles on the causes of World War I in the prestigious American Historical Review journal. Nevertheless, a connection to the discredit "revisionists" exists - according to Lipstadt - in the person of Harry Elmer Barnes. Novick contrasts the split among historians who are lumped together as revisionists, "Moderate revisionists on World War I, like Sidney B. Fay, or on the Civil War, like Avery O. Craven, might display a relativistic sensibility; the more zealous, like Harry Elmer Barnes, were engaged in a holy crusade to replace error with truth."

American Civil War revisionist James G. Randall defined the process, "The scholarly revisionist overthrows only falsehood. Revisionism is not a matter of promoting a theory. It is a matter of findings."

Another example is the revisionist historians of Reconstruction after the U.S. Civil War who rejected the dominant Dunning School that found the blacks were tools of evil Carpetbaggers, and instead stressed economic greed on the part of northern businessmen. Indeed, in recent years a "neoabolitionist" revisionism has become standard, that uses the moral standards of the 19th century abolitionists to criticize racial policies. "Foner's book represents the mature and settled Revisionist perspective," historian Michael Perman has concluded regarding Eric Foner's Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877 (1988)

Revisionism also occurred in the historiography of the American Civil War. Historian Peter Novick writes:

The "revisionist" school of Civil War historiography argued that inept statecraft and irresponsible extremism had produced a "needless war." Avery O. Craven asserted that the conflict was "the work of politicians and pious cranks"; for James G. Randall it was the combination of "fanaticism" and "bogus leadership" of a "blundering generation."

The role of American business and the alleged "robber barons" began to be revised in the 1930s. Given the term "business revisionism", writers and historians such as Ida Tarbell, Allan Nevins, and Louis Hacker emphasized the positive contributions of individuals who were previously pictured as villains. Novick writes, "The argument that whatever the moral delinquencies of the robber barons, these were far outweighed by their decisive contributions to American military prowess, was frequently invoked by Allan Nevins."

Post-revisionism

Subsequent to the work of the revisionists, a new historiography, a historiography of the Cold War emerged, which criticized the work of the former. These scholars became known as post-revisionists.

Bush's criticism of revision of history

In 2003 President Bush became critical of revision of history. But that discourse involves the criticism of the wars with Iraq and Afghanistan. But these are not the subjects of the earlier "revisionists" whose concerns were focused, initially, on World War I and, subsequently, the Cold War. The Holocaust deniers source of controversy involves, substantially, World War II, particularly denying the Holocaust, and even portraying Hitler in better light. These were not the subjects with which the American revisionist historians concerned themselves.

See also

Revisionist historians (American):

• • Deborah Lipstadt
  • Gabriel Kolko
  • Gar Alperovitz
  • Howard Zinn
  • Sidney B. Fay
  • Walter LaFeber
  • William Appleman Williams

Other relevant articles:

• Deborah Lipstadt
• Historiography of the Cold War

References

1. Lynn Boyd Hinds, Theodore Otto Windt Jr., The Cold War as Rhetoric: The Beginnings, 1945-1950
2. Deborah Lipstadt, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory, Plume (The Penguin Group), 1994.
3. Lynn Boyd Hinds, Theodore Otto Windt Jr., The Cold War as Rhetoric: The Beginnings, 1945-1950
4. Deborah Lipstadt, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory, Plume (The Penguin Group), 1994.
5. Novick p. 276
6. Novick p. 276
7. Bernard Weisberger, "The Dark and Bloody Ground of Reconstruction Historiography," The Journal of Southern History, Vol. 25, No. 4 (Nov., 1959), pp. 427-447 in JSTOR
8. Michael Perman, "Review: Eric Foner's Reconstruction: A Finished Revolution," Reviews in American History, Vol. 17, No. 1 (Mar., 1989), pp. 73-78 in JSTOR
9. Novick p. 237
10. Kolko, Gabriel. "The Premises of Business Revisionism" in The Business History Review, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Autumn, 1959), p. 334
11. Novick p. 342. Novick describes Nevins as "the best known voice of what came to be called "business history revisionism." (p. 343)
12. Deborah Lipstadt, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory, (Plume, The Penguin Group, 1994)

Sources

• Deborah Lipstadt

Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory

(Plume, The Penguin Group, 1994)

• Lynn Boyd Hinds, Theodore Otto Windt Jr.

The Cold War as Rhetoric: The Beginnings, 1945-1950

• Adrianus Arnoldus, Maria van der Linden

A revolt against liberalism: American radical historians, 1959-1976

• Novick, Peter. That Noble Dream: The Objectivity Question and the American Historical profession. (1988) p. 395

American (historical) revisionist works

• D. F. Fleming

The Cold War and Its Origins, 2 vols.

(New York: Doubleday, 1961)

• William Appleman Williams

The Tragedy of American Diplomacy, 2d ed., rev. and enlarged

(New York: Delta, 1962)

• David Horowitz

The Free World Colossus: A Critique of American Foreign Policy in the Cold War (New York: Hill and Wang, 1965)

• David Horowitz, ed.

Corporations and the Cold War

(New York: Modern Reader, 1969)

• Gabriel Kolko

The Politics of War: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1943-1945

(New York: Random House, 1968)

• Joyce and Gabriel Kolko

The Limits of Power, 1945-1954

(New York: Harper and Row, 1972)

External links

This history article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e

• Articles needing expert attention from September 2009
• History
• Historiography
• History stubs