| Revision as of 04:58, 10 September 2009 editWildhartlivie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,910 edits →The Game (U.S. TV series): new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:44, 10 September 2009 edit undoPinkadelica (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,689 edits →Re: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Please stop edit warring over this article. The detailed hidden section you put into the article is inappropriate. We do ''not'' include twitter posts in articles, whether they are hidden or in the open. Twitter is not a reliable source per policy and neither are BV Buzz blog posts. See ]. ] (]) 04:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC) | Please stop edit warring over this article. The detailed hidden section you put into the article is inappropriate. We do ''not'' include twitter posts in articles, whether they are hidden or in the open. Twitter is not a reliable source per policy and neither are BV Buzz blog posts. See ]. ] (]) 04:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Re == | |||
| Regarding your message to my talk page, I told you once before that your argument about Twitter links in other articles is not going to work. I don't know what goes on the thousands of other articles on the project but if ''I'' come across Twitter links (or other unreliable sources such as blogs), I remove them. Additionally, I didn't undo the three columns that you so desperately want in the article. I simply used a different mark up that automatically evens out the list of names. In other words, it produced the '''exact same result'''. '''<font color="MediumSlateBlue" face="Tahoma">]</font><sup><font color="Black">]</font></sup>''' 05:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:44, 10 September 2009
The Game (U.S. TV series)
Please stop edit warring over this article. The detailed hidden section you put into the article is inappropriate. We do not include twitter posts in articles, whether they are hidden or in the open. Twitter is not a reliable source per policy and neither are BV Buzz blog posts. See WP:RS. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Re
Regarding your message to my talk page, I told you once before that your argument about Twitter links in other articles is not going to work. I don't know what goes on the thousands of other articles on the project but if I come across Twitter links (or other unreliable sources such as blogs), I remove them. Additionally, I didn't undo the three columns that you so desperately want in the article. I simply used a different mark up that automatically evens out the list of names. In other words, it produced the exact same result. Pinkadelica 05:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)