Revision as of 03:22, 7 July 2009 editTisthammerw (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,242 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:24, 7 July 2009 edit undoTisthammerw (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,242 editsm →CleanupNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Cleanup== | ==Cleanup== | ||
While I think my changes (better organization, extra rebuttals, citations etc.) improve from where it was , I'll let the "clean up" box remain for now in case other improvements need to be made (I cited from only one book, after all). | While I think my (better organization, extra rebuttals, citations etc.) improve from where it was , I'll let the "clean up" box remain for now in case other improvements need to be made (I cited from only one book, after all). | ||
--] (]) 03: |
--] (]) 03:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Miscellaneous== | ==Miscellaneous== |
Revision as of 03:24, 7 July 2009
Philosophy: Logic Unassessed | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cleanup
While I think my changes (better organization, extra rebuttals, citations etc.) improve from where it was before, I'll let the "clean up" box remain for now in case other improvements need to be made (I cited from only one book, after all). --Wade A. Tisthammer (talk) 03:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Miscellaneous
Why does open question argument divert to naturalistic fallacy but open question diverts to this page and the title reads 'Open Question Argument'? Naturalistic fallacy appears to be better sourced and talks about the same thing. -Bottlecapninja 12:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
In the last paragraph it reads "Others hold..." who are 'others'?MrMelonhead (talk) 03:57, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Categories: