| Revision as of 08:35, 2 July 2009 editDYKadminBot (talk | contribs)25,702 edits Giving DYK credit for Lublin Ghetto on behalf of Giants27← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:37, 4 July 2009 edit undoMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits →Appeal: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| |On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <sub>(])</sub> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <sub>(])</sub> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | ||
| |} ] (<span>]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 08:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | |} ] (<span>]<nowiki>|</nowiki>]) 08:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Appeal == | |||
| Thanks for your note. I don't have any issue with you mentioning me. Good luck with your appeal. It does seem unfair that you would be sanctioned before you were given warning. — ] {{toolbar|separator=dot|] | ] }} 04:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:37, 4 July 2009
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
What do you think?
]
Important
] ]
DYK for Lucas Welfare Cost of Fluctuations
|
On June 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lucas Welfare Cost of Fluctuations, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Wizardman 02:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
I wanted you to know I appreciated your statements on the 3RR notice board. It appears I still have much to learn regarding the policies and guidelines. To that end I have decided to relinquish rollback and return to manual editing for the near future. I want to earn the trust of editors in general; that desire is stronger with regard to those, like yourself, that have gone out of their way to help and support me. See ya 'round Tiderolls 00:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Lublin Ghetto
Ladnie ci zrobilem? A na pl mnie zbanowali. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 01:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1RR limit
 | Under the terms of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren I am placing you on a one revert per week limitation for all articles covered by that Arbitration case (Eastern Europe, broadly defined). You are prohibited from making more than one reversion per week per article, not including obvious vandalism. A reversion is any edit that substantially restores the article to prior content, whether or not it is a reversion in the purely technical sense. All reversions must be discussed on the article talk page. Violations will result in escalating blocks. You may request to have the 1RR limit reviewed or lifted after 6 months. This limit is imposed following evidence of prolonged edit warring, the Arbitration Enforcement complaint made here, and as a result of the recent disgraceful edit warring at at Nashi (youth movement) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) over the inclusion of Category:Anti-fascist organizations. While no editor violated the 3RR rule (4 reverts in 24 hours) there were at least 23 reversion of the category between June 11 and June 21, without a single comment by anyone on the talk page. The list of editors and reversions makes a prima facia case for tag-team editing; whether it was organized or spontaneous is irrelevant, and it is not required that I prove anything one way or the other. It's time to edit cooperatively and use the talk pages to discuss disputes. |
Thatcher 03:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
reminder
remember when you said this? Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Spieprzaj dziadu!. Ostap 15:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Lublin Ghetto
Thank you for your note. It's an interesting article. Frankly, I'm surprised Misplaced Pages didn't have an article about the ghetto previously. Thanks for taking care of that. :-) — ] (talk · contribs) 03:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
WP:AE
Hi, Skäpperöd just started another WP:AE against me and he also mentioned you and Jacurek.. Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Loosmark (talk) 17:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Lucas on cost of recession
Nice article. I've added a little bit on the equity premium, will expand if I get time.JQ (talk) 21:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
RfCU for Viriditas
Although you are not a party, I am letting you know that I cited an attack upon you and a comment of yours to Viriditas -- as one of many comments by other editors to Viriditas re his/her posting behavior -- in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Viriditas, which covers Viriditas' WP:Wikihounding campaign. Mosedschurte (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Lublin Ghetto
|
|
On July 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lublin Ghetto, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Giants27 (
c|s) 08:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Appeal
Thanks for your note. I don't have any issue with you mentioning me. Good luck with your appeal. It does seem unfair that you would be sanctioned before you were given warning. — ] (talk · contribs) 04:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)