| Revision as of 17:19, 7 March 2009 editA Nobody (talk | contribs)53,000 edits →Jedi Code: new← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:43, 8 March 2009 edit undoRenamed user Sloane (talk | contribs)7,015 edits →Regarding thisNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| ==Regarding ]== | ==Regarding ]== | ||
| Please note that sources do attest to its notability, i.e. "" and that is verifiable in . Best, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 17:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | Please note that sources do attest to its notability, i.e. "" and that is verifiable in . Best, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 17:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == AfD nomination of ] == | |||
| ] ] has been nominated for deletion and you were involved in ] about a different article involving the same cartoon series. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.--] (]) 00:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:43, 8 March 2009
User:EEMIV/activetalkpageheader
- Archive 1 - 17 July 05 to 22 Oct 06
- Archive 2 - 24 Oct 06 to 26 Feb 07
- Archive 3 - 28 Feb 07 to 21 June 07
- Archive 4 - 25 June 07 to 1 Aug 07
- Archive 5 - 6 Aug 07 to 2 Oct 07
- Archive 6 - 2 Oct 07 to 30 Dec 07
- Archive 7 - 1 Jan 08 to 25 Apr 08
- Archive 8 - 30 Apr 08 to 28 Jul 08
- Archive 9 - 29 July 08 to 15 Sep 08
- Archive 10 - 17 Sep 08 to 14 Dec 08
- Archive 11 - 16 Dec 08 to 16 Feb 09
- Archive 12 - 16 Feb 09 to 16 Apr 09
- Archive 13 - 21 Apr 09 to 9 July 09
- Archive 14 - 18 July 09 to 13 Dec 09
- Archive 15 - 24 Dec 09 to 21 Feb 11
- Archive 16 - 29 Mar 11 to 23 Feb 13
- Archive 17 - 1 Mar 13 to 4 Nov 13
- Archive 18 - 11 Nov 13 to 3 Mar 14
- Archive 19 - 10 Mar 14 to 21 Jun 14
- Archive 20 - 23 Jun 14 to 5 Oct 14
- Archive 21 - 13 Oct 14 to 16 Mar 15
- Archive 22 - 19 Mar 15 to 1 Feb 16
- Archive 23 - 8 Feb 16 to ...
Orient Express
I write this after the couple reverted edits on Orient Express and I get this back? Wonder what that means? lol.
Jim Dunning | talk 00:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like he's admitting to deliberate needling. --EEMIV (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
RfA thanks
 | Sabre (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC) |
Tarquin
No problem removing the Tarquin link on Grand Moff's page. I was simply repeating what was on the page for the real King Tarquin. It seems logical that the name would be reused like this, but I agree there's no reference as such. Incidentally, since you like Star Wars, have you seen the current New Yorker (with Rodriguez on steroids on the cover)? It has an interesting article about digging at sites in Tunisia and California where the films were made, looking for relics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Weil (talk • contribs)
Jedi Code
How was that edit "Self-published unreliable source, essentially regurgitation/summary; still non-notable original research." ? Ren ✉ 01:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, there are no specific citations. There's no evidence the Jedi Code actually matters either in the real or fake world. There's no cited third-party commentary at all. The single item in the references list is some quasi-religion thing that doesn't seem to qualify as independent. Basically, same issues and benchmarks I put on the talk page two+ months ago remain unaddressed. --EEMIV (talk) 01:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Regarding this
Please note that sources do attest to its notability, i.e. "the story most familiar with US audiences" and that is verifiable in published books. Best, --A Nobody 17:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of SDF-1 Macross
SDF-1 Macross has been nominated for deletion and you were involved in a previous AfD about a different article involving the same cartoon series. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/SDF-1 Macross. Thank you.--Sloane (talk) 00:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)