Revision as of 03:58, 18 January 2009 editGLaDOS (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,565 edits Message re. 1906 San Francisco earthquake (HG)← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:05, 18 January 2009 edit undoGLaDOS (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,565 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== January 2009 == | == January 2009 == | ||
I believe this was an error on my behalf. Your warning has been removed. ] (]) 04:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggledelete1 --> ] (]) 03:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:05, 18 January 2009
Just letting you know that there is a discussion about your edits on the admin noticeboard here on the admin noticeboard.
As a side note the orange "you have a message" bar should disappear as soon as you visit this page. It is not necessary to blank the page to get rid of it. One approach you might consider is to log into an account for editing, and not logging in for browsing. That way you will not be bothered with messages when you are merely browsing the encyclopedia. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 10:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Before leaving me a message
I understand that people have seen me as having an attitude and referred to my discussion with Vidritas (I think that's his username) and my initial defense of my contributions I did listen. I understand that minor edits are when fixing punctuation or maybe fixing a link that is with wrong code. I do not remove fact tags with a bad intention. I understand others need time to cite something if there is a citation available.
But why do they only want to cite it after it was tagged for 2 months or longer and then they notice that I take it off, if it's something important to an article me or anyone else removing it shouldn't be what initiates a citation.
January 2009
I believe this was an error on my behalf. Your warning has been removed. GLaDOS (talk) 04:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)