Revision as of 15:03, 18 October 2008 editCeoil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers172,033 edits →Argument: sp.← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:07, 18 October 2008 edit undoCeoil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers172,033 edits →Argument: prickNext edit → | ||
Line 437: | Line 437: | ||
==Argument== | ==Argument== | ||
Henrikgj virgin_T20 654, I brought 1907 up on the TFA talk page. We'll see what happens, before we cut each other apart. ] <sup>]</sup> 15:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:07, 18 October 2008
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border: 2px solid #4682B4; width: 100%; font-size: 90%;" ! style="background: #B0C4DE; border-bottom: 2px solid #4682B4; width: 17%;" | JayHenry ! style="background: #B0C4DE; border-bottom: 2px solid #4682B4; width: 16%;" | Opuses ! style="background: #B0C4DE; border-bottom: 2px solid #4682B4; width: 17%;" | Hippos ! style="background: #B0C4DE; border-bottom: 2px solid #4682B4; width: 17%;" | Boxes ! style="background: #B0C4DE; border-bottom: 2px solid #4682B4; width: 16%; border-right: 2px solid #4682B4;" | Chimpmanzee ! style="background:#F0F8FF; border-bottom: 0px; width: 17%;" | Talk |-
| colspan="2" style="background: #F0F8FF;" |
| colspan="2" style="background: #F0F8FF;" |
Discuss Nicely!
| colspan="2" style="background: #F0F8FF;" |
15 January 2025 |
|
The Archives of Jay Henry
- TAoJH, Volume 1
- TAoJH, Volume 2
- TAoJH, Volume 3
- TAoJH, Volume 4
- TAoJH, Volume 5
- TAoJH, Volume 6
- TAoJH, Volume 7
- TAoJH, Volume 8
- TAoJH, Volume 9
|}
Peace in our (but not whiskeydogs) time
You can lay down you army of ip socks brother. A new day is breaking, and its glorious to see. Today Whiskeydog, tomorrow arbcom, and on sunday we rest. Ceoil 21:22, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Your holyness,1000s are watching this, but I fear they not fear us enough. We could cut off his hands or feeth or someting, as long as its dramatic; what do you reckon? Your holyness. xxxx Ceoil 22:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Interesting brother. I meant feath (Feet: faeth: sorry carnt spell) (I know now a frew guys on NAI so dont worry), but teeth sounds interesting too. Lets just let it for the moment and let the excitment carry us to whereever it takes us. This is suppoesed to be fun; lets not think too much, eh? xxxx Ceoil 23:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Henry, its my habit to throw out you tube links; and this seems appropriate, given the Second Triumvirate struggle underfoot. Ceoil 18:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- How reassured I was to read you message and see that you have not lost the run of your self and know your palce in the social order: Third. There is hope for our friend yet, you understand the events of the last few days only occured because I am dreadfully bored and wanted to amuse myself. I have not yet decided if blood is needed to sate my curosity as to how far my subjects worship me. It seems likely though. I had been hoping to get a little nudity aout of this, but saw your likeness on Laura's page. Thanks, but no thanks. Ceoil 18:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Shit, I thought all that business was forgotten about. I have to say that the Fat Man is one of my favourite editors and I'll always make exceptions for him regardless of how heavy he has been hitting the cake. Whatever did happen to Isolation booth's cute little tail, by the way? Ceoil 19:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- How reassured I was to read you message and see that you have not lost the run of your self and know your palce in the social order: Third. There is hope for our friend yet, you understand the events of the last few days only occured because I am dreadfully bored and wanted to amuse myself. I have not yet decided if blood is needed to sate my curosity as to how far my subjects worship me. It seems likely though. I had been hoping to get a little nudity aout of this, but saw your likeness on Laura's page. Thanks, but no thanks. Ceoil 18:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Ah, there was a brilliant moral in this! My apologies for saying you were stringing along. The moral then, applies to me too. But you will never put Hank Rearden in jail, second-hander. Whiskeydog (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes (in reply to earlier random comment I just noticed on my talk page), it's always fun to see how long a fair-use image stays on a talk page. Automation--we'd be cavemen slavemen without it. Now, more to the point of me stopping by, it's clear you have no interest in letting anyone
add trivia toedit the panic of 1907 , so you're getting close to going back on The List. Whiskeydog (talk) 06:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
JayHenry, you get around more than me - is this where we're going with referencing now? This is the scariest thing I've seen in article space yet, and it actually confirms my personal reductio ad absurdum of the sensibility here, in which this site will no longer be an encyclopedia per se, but rather it will consist of sets of clauses marked up in wiki-code that indicate what source they've been paraphrased from. This horrible prognostication of mine is the formalization of an "article" (a human, written thing) into an "object" (a computer programming entity having defined attributes and behaviors). We're going to end up with "articles" that are really "database records", aren't we? Is anyone going to stop this? I don't go around saying I'm smart, but am I really the only one who can conceptualize any of this and see why there's a problem? Or have the rest just left wikipedia, or never joined? It's a worry, and I'm not doing the rhetorical glib routine here (except for the rhetorical questions, of course, at the end!) Whiskeydog (talk) 09:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- This redlinked username hurts my soul. --JayHenry (t) 05:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
DYK
On 19 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles W. Morse, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Jordan 09:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Panic of 1907
Great job on the Panic article. I also read the Bruner and Carr book and wanted to add a lot of the info from there, but haven't had the time. I may come behind you with a few additions, but keep up the good work. I'm a former JPM analyst and have visited his library, hence the interest.--Robertknyc (talk) 19:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Jay, I was hired at JPM in 1994 a little after the book came out, but didn't get a copy...perhaps that's a newer policy. I have the book now and haven't quite finished it but have read the sections on Pierpont. As for the Dow data, I have it through my quote service. I could send you a file of the raw data if you're good at making charts out of it. Otherwise, I could try myself though I'm not sure of how it looks. The chart I use has a copyright attached to it and probably wouldn't be allowed.
--Robertknyc (talk) 01:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
On the Dow chart, yes, I guess I'd just use the weekly closing price instead of the way you have it. You also need to note on the chart that it's the Dow Industrials, and then "weekly close" assuming you go with that. Also, you need to divide the price scale by 10. CQG data do not have a decimal point, so in reality the Dow in 1907 peaked at 103, not 1030. The time frame you chose looks good. Finally, I think I'd go with a white background instead of black, and use a dark color for the prices. If you only have the option of a black background, then use a white or yellow line for price. Thanks for doing it. --Robertknyc (talk) 03:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Most people in technical analysis are used to either a line chart of closing prices, or a bar chart with OHLC. Having all three superimposed in different colors is a very non-standard format, so while it would be nice to have the total range for the week I think all the different colors are a little unusual. Does Excel have a chart wizard that can make bar charts? If you're not familiar with Excel I guess I can take a look, though I'm a novice with it. --Robertknyc (talk) 04:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Well, you already know more about Excel than I do, so I'll defer to you on that. I think I like the tighter time frame on the first chart to highlight more closely the 1907 period. Obviously we can edit the posted chart at any time, and perhaps someone with some good charting software will show up who can create a bar chart.
--Robertknyc (talk) 04:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
So you're going to stick with the OHLC? I noticed one more thing, can you tighten the y-axis scale, say from 350-400 instead of 0 on the bottom, and 1100 on the high side instead of 1200? That would blow up the data a bit more so it would be easier to see. --Robertknyc (talk) 05:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Sounds good, I say post it. --Robertknyc (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
The caption is fine, though the y-axis is still 0-1200 and you still need to divide the data by 10. --Robertknyc (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Ah, yes, looks good...I kept seeing the older version all this time. Have a good night. --Robertknyc (talk) 05:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Re: Kurt timeline
Ohh, ok. Thanks for that, please feel free to correct me on ANI. Yes, the main reason for the move to the subpage was the length - it was getting next to impossible to post anywhere on ANI for the edit conflicts. Hersfold 18:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Commercial & Financial Chronicle DYK
Hi JayHenry. Just a note in case it disappears from T:TDYK before you see it: I checked the link you added to the reference in Commercial & Financial Chronicle and everything looks fine. Keep up the good work! Olaf Davis | Talk 17:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Ceoil
Henrik, my name is Ceoil. C-E-O-fucking I L. Not Cile, cloil, nor cLEOI. My mercy only streaches so far, so get your shit correct. Ceoil 20:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Spelled m-i-l-k on AOL in 1994. And things have changed and thousands of children in China are ill today, or so I read. And the Minneapolis Public Library is closed on Mondays and beg your pardon, and I can walk. Thanks. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- P.S. Fair enough, my reply was not deleted. How nice. -SusanLesch (talk) 21:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- References
- Yardley, Jim (September 20, 2008). "China Seeks to Calm Fears Amid Dairy Scandal". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved 2008-09-21.
I fear I can only confront one travesty at a time. First Ceoil — tomorrow the world. --JayHenry (talk) 21:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, JayHenry. You and Mr./Dr. Ceoil are mentioned on my user page today. I will let him know as well. Cheers. Are you doing okay? -SusanLesch (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Commercial & Financial Chronicle
On 22 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Commercial & Financial Chronicle, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 05:05, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
List of enemies...
Hi Jay, I'm not gonna get involved the the specifics of the argument, but was hoping you could try and diffuse the situation somewhat by removing the list from your user page. I've looked up to you as an editor and see that as somewhat of a disappointment. Please consider removing it. Thank you Jay. — Realist 02:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Realist, unless you want to be added to both Jay and mine own enemys list; watch yer clout, and back up. The list is a joke, and anyway man, you are a seen as a good friend, so no worries, I wish there was ten of you. Ceoil 02:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK, my bad I guess. I've been told that I don't understand jokes, humor, sarcasm, etc etc. — Realist 02:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
United Copper
On 23 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article United Copper, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 08:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Wikis Take Manhattan
Wikis Take Manhattan
|
WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Misplaced Pages and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Misplaced Pages Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well.
LAST YEAR'S EVENT
- Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Takes Manhattan/Spring 2008 (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
- Commons:Misplaced Pages Takes Manhattan/Gallery (our cool gallery)
WINNINGS? Prizes include a dinner for three with Misplaced Pages creator Jimmy Wales at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more!
WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.
WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!
REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.
WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:
- 349 W. 12th St. #3
- Between Greenwich & Washington Streets
- By the 14th St./8th Ave. ACE/L stop
FOR UPDATES
Check out:
- Wikis Take Manhattan main website
This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.
Thanks,
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Tulip mania at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests.
FWIW, I requested Tulip Mania for Sept. 30 for "Today's Featured Article." I count 4 points, no real date applicability, but with the current financial crisis there is a "current" connection. 2 supports and no opposes so far, but we'll see how it goes. I'd guess that the nominator makes 3 supports, but that other article editors wouldn't really add to the totals.
Let's hope for luck.
Smallbones (talk) 01:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, JayHenry
Thank you for supporting my RfA nomination, JayHenry. Your kind words and speaking up for me after questions were raised about my "punishment" comment on the hoax issue were greatly appreciated. I must say, though, that despite some criticisms I received, the comment that most concerned me was your note about having thought I was a woman! I guess my "muy macho" persona doesn't come through in print. Anyway, thanks again for the support. Cbl62 (talk) 06:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Re: Dow 36000
I don't know your politics, but this post by Brad Delong is a riot. Protonk (talk) 04:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Winter Palace
Hi J, can you help me? (yet again) I want to upload this modofied plan Image:Modified WinterPalace.jpg onto the {{template Winter Palace}, there are a few more rooms (Number 42 onwards)plus I have changed a colour scheme - I thought as it was only a modified version of the original it would just upload on top, and work just the same but it won't! Is it a lot of work - t0 change it? Giano (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thanks
Thanks for the 25 DYK medal and your kind words. I am looking forward to the next 25 too, although there's still a long way to go to reach Thucydides, I am afraid ;). Cheers, take care, and keep up your own very good work! Constantine ✍ 22:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Tulip mania a go go
Jay,
They finally put Tulip mania up on the schedule for tommorrow (almost today). With today's (yesterday's) vote on the bailout plan and -777 on the DJIA, it looks like it's gone up on probably the most interesting day possible!
I've read Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2008-06-09/Dispatches on how to monitor changes during the day. We'll see what happens. Frankly, I expect that there might be some problems with people calling today(y) a crash of unprecedented proportions, the sky is falling, and saying the article has an ostrich-like POV. Not to get too defensive, but I worked a lot on an article that became known as January 2008 stock market volatility trying to convince people that the world had not ended on Martin Luther King's birthday. (See the 1st day's edits, the article then was known as Black Monday (2008)).
Well, it could be interesting.
Smallbones (talk) 23:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep up the good work. I'm getting some sleep. Smallbones (talk) 03:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hey that was fun. Now off the main page. "12 bottles of beer (was) were drunk" is actually a matter of style (I'd guess our MOS allows both). Thanks. Smallbones (talk) 00:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Panic of 1907
Hi, I am reviewing your article, Panic of 1907, for GA. I have read it through and think that it is a wonderful, fascinating article. I saw a few very minor prose issues which I will list on the review page tomorrow, although with anything else that I pick up on. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 23:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have added comments to the review page and will add more after you respond. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 23:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- I have passed the article as GA as editors have improved it. Definitely of GA quality and more! Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 22:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Fascinating article! A good read in these dark days. Hope you are well. --Melty girl 05:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Please take a look at Misplaced Pages talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Articles on recent financial market crashes
Any comment welcome. Smallbones (talk) 16:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
This may be not be the right reference for you but...
wat? Facepalm. This is what happens when you have people with social welfare functions that have a 2-6 year horizon determining long run fiscal policy. Let's make a 700 billion dollar spending bill which was obviously going to be financed by borrowing and attach tax cuts to it, which will cause other spending to be financed by borrowing. On top of that, let's make those tax cuts temporary so that the change in the consumption function is ~0. Awesome. Protonk (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
thumb|Unfortunately, this is a "fair use" image Yeah, CSD may not be the best place - but the question is where is anyplace that would deal with this? The Jan.21st article was a nightmare (and linked to the news section on the main page). Editors would write "Al Jezeera said it was a crash" or "OK, it didn't crash more today, but let's wait until tomorrow," and "If you don't like the article, go for an AFD" which of course would take a week. Just check out talk:January 2008 stock market volatility.
I'll write a proposed guideline, if anybody can tell me where it fits. I don't think I could write a template however. Maybe a big purple box saying "Misplaced Pages cannot offer investment advice, nor can it predict the direction of the stock market. If you are interpreting this article as saying that a stock market crash is ongoing and that you should panic, either you or the article is terribly wrong." Maybe include a picture from the cover of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. I'm done - enough venting for today. BTW, I left you a message on Protonk's talk page about "salt and matches." Smallbones (talk) 03:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the DYK medal
Hey there! Thank you for the 25 medal! :) It's quite encouraging to receive one and keep on going. Thanks again. Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 05:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Inability to disengage?
Well, the RFA is going down in flames, which I kind of expected, but your stated reason surprised me. What makes you feel that I can't disengage? Aside from maintaining some of the redirects as stable, I don't participate in fiction much any more. I debate things on the various RFCs and guidelines, and got involved a bit when I saw some of the recent AFDs turning into anti-TTN rallies, but I don't wade into that mess anymore. I feel pretty disengaged.—Kww(talk) 13:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- To argue that Phil Sandifer and I don't get along well isn't completely untrue. We get along better than that particular exchange would indicate. We even had an interesting debate as to whether his proposed changes to WP:N would actually make me notable (scroll down a bit).
- As for Bulbasaur, it was the edit war during January, when people undid the redirect to the list of Pokemon, and started screaming that Bulbasaur was more notable than other Pokemon that soured me, and was the source of the quoted comment. Point of fact, it isn't. There are still no third-party sources in that article that directly discuss Bulbasaur (with the exception of one joke about pesto) ... it's all Nintendo licensed material. A small group of editors decided that they didn't have to follow the same guidelines as everyone else, and that they could have an article on their favorite topic simply because they wanted one. All I asked then, and now, is that someone demonstrate the existence of a few independent, third-party sources that examine Bulbasaur directly and in detail. Until such sources can be produced, there shouldn't be an article. And yes, I have a very low opinion of editors that say I don't care what WP:N says, I'm going to keep undoing the redirect on this article and you can't stop me, or pile on to AFDs about the article falsely claiming that it meets WP:N when in fact, it does not.—Kww(talk) 16:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Good work
The Epic Barnstar | ||
I, Peter Isotalo, hereby award JayHenry the Epic Barnstar for his work on tulip mania, an outstanding example of an interesting, concise and well-balanced historical article. |
I was delighted to see your article as a featured article. I hope you decide to work on more history topics in the future.
Peter 07:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Foxy Loxy's RfA
Hello, this message is to inform you that User:Foxy Loxy has restarted their RfA. The new discussion is located at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Foxy Loxy 2. GlassCobra 09:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - October 2008
Issue 27 - October 2008 |
---|
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed template
Would you check out my proposed template at User:Smallbones/draft template. Any comments appreciated. BTW, the template MAY be useful today. Smallbones (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
All is for the best, in this, the best of all possible worlds
I just wanted to let you know that I understand that your opposition was in good faith, and thank for your comments on how unreasonable the forest fire became in response to your single match.
I'm going to try to interpret this resounding defeat as a statement that I should choose my words more carefully in the future, and remember that every statement I make gets recorded forever, just waiting to get carefully transcribed onto my next RFA. I would go insane if I believed that it was repudiation of what I truly meant: that no editor should consciously and willfully ignore guidelines and policies, and editors that repeatedly do so should not be rewarded for or supported in doing so.
I'm sure I'll get back to full speed editing soon, because, after all, , every day, and in every way, I am getting better and better.—Kww(talk) 05:39, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Marlow
Hey, Jay! Life is busy-good, I'm enjoying it. How about yourself? I see you've been busy, what with timely economic articles and such. Funny you ask, because one of my favorite papers I wrote in undergrad was about Marlow and his view on women. Here are some sources from a precursory search (some are available via NetLibrary and/or Googlebooks):
- Billy, Ted. "Heart of Darkness (1899)". A Joseph Conrad Companion. Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 1999.
- Bloom, Harold. Marlow: Major Literary Characters. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1992.
- Bock, Martin. Joseph Conrad and Psychological Medicine. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press, 2002.
- Schwarz, Daniel R. Rereading Conrad. Columbia University of Missouri Press, 2001.
- Simmons, Allan. "The Marlow Trilogy: Youth, Heart of Darkness and Lord Jim". Joseph Conrad. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
That's as far as I got, but there's quite a few biographies on Conrad that just love to talk about his alter ego. These are ones I was able to peek at and seemed to have some great insight into the character, and not just the connection with Conrad himself. Hope this helps! Let me know if you need more. María (habla conmigo) 12:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, dear Brit
Thats beyond the beyond, my friend, but as you are so damn pretty I'll let it slide. I have to say its great to see finance realted articles being pushed, and if you ever find your self short of a copieditor who cant spell copiedito; i'm here. ......o.i..c..el 08:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Jay I have a very strong feeling that if we focus in on 1907 and carry it through to mainpage, it precience would do alot for the site's crediability, in fact I would go as far to say that journalists would pick up on it. Most of the reviewers have mentioned timelyness, and its very true, and we should capatilise on it. Ceoil 15:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Any reasonable person would throw this up on main page, with pleasure, given the current economic climate. Its a great and accessable article; we should maximise it potential. Without wanting to be glib, nobody really gives a fuck about the daffodile market, but they care about this stuff. Ceoil 15:34, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think we should call in Whiskeydog. Ceoil 15:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
To J—H——
While the market may have fallen
yet another ten percent,
your Panic of Oh-Seven
has become the main event.
Would that prose could pay down debt,
and add liquidity!—
Could prop up falling prices
and recharge the S&P.
Were this the case, I'd send you off
post-haste to rake the muck;
but false prophets print reports
at length and pray at night to Luck.
Though be the wallet far from swelling,
some tall tales are ripe for telling;
what is missing ain't the selling,
it's The Panic of Oh-Eight.
—Whiskeydog (talk)
Right. I'd nom at WP:TFAR on the sole basis that the article is very closely related to a major global event, and on that alone. By November 4th, god knows what will have happened. By the way I love the way the Whiskeydog account provides a nice handly link to its talk page, but if you post there, they will get an admin to just delete it; woosh and your gone ;).Ceoil 20:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations and a suggestion
Long-Term Capital Management. Get hot. Protonk (talk) 00:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- Saw your message on User talk:Protonk re being pessimistic: "If a paragraph explanation of short selling still comes across as an abstract area of finance I'm definitely worry about explaining fixed income arbitrage, Over-the-counter derivative/swap trading, etc. to the FAC crowd."
- The key is to have a bunch of explanatory sub articles to wikilink to. I worked on several Indian architecture articles using architectural terms in languages like Kannada, Tamil etc. FAC cried out "explain what that means!", so I wrote little sub articles just big enough to explain each term. A little bit easier there, as I could find pictures from India of temple features to illustrate. But still, the time has come for people to understand finance. Even Tony at FAC was surprisingly mild, once he got over his initial flip out over the word "antitrust" in your article (which he say "even Americans" probably didn't understand).
- FAC's first reaction was "oh, its American, so I'm not expected to know about it". But I think your article gave them pause to consider maybe this is something they really should have a grasp of.
- I tried to do little articles on "bear squeeze" and "rich man's panic" but couldn't find references quickly enough for your FAC. I hope you consider doing some of these articles you are talking about. I would even get some books and attempt to understand finance in order to help out. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 02:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Imposter or doppleganger?
User talk:JayHenry's Attorney ? Is that you? Protonk (talk) 09:01, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Unlikely I'd say, although worth a thread on WR and ANI; maybe even an RfA: just for the sheer juice. Whatever happend to Sidaway, anyway.Ceoil 10:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Erm..huh? Sidaway and Jay? About as different as chalk and the proverbial cheese I'd a thunk, unless there is some history I ain't aware of...Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- My point exactly, Casliber. Jay wouldn't be inclined to explode thing out of proportion. By the way, its been a poor mushroom season here this october; and luck down under? ...sláinteCeoil 10:44, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Erm..huh? Sidaway and Jay? About as different as chalk and the proverbial cheese I'd a thunk, unless there is some history I ain't aware of...Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Autumn 2007 was huge here, but 2008 was not so crash hot, but it is funny, if we have a warm-hot spring and lots of rain, it tricks lots of the northern hemisphere introduced species like Lactarius deliciosus and Suillus luteus into fruiting under the pine plantations in spring. otherwise we wait till easter. I find both these ok-ish, but much prefer Pleurotus eryngii, which are hitting the markets big-time here (yum), and there are always dried morels and porcini (also yum), I had dried Boletus badius the other day which was milder than procini but nice in a different way, and Wood Blewits are being cultivated here and sold, now they are yummy...No-one really eats native Oz species as almost all are of unknown edibility. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Bone dry here, unfortuniatly. Its been both humid and wet, but not enough of either to get the blighters to grow. I'm seruosly considering changing hemisphere ...sláinte Ceoil 11:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Summer here will mean a few boleti and amanitas may pop up after rain, none that I would be game to eat of course. There are a crop of Phlebopus marginatus, a giant funny bolete-type thing, nearby which seem to pop up in the spring for some reason..Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
psilocybe content; and normally they are eVerywhere; but maybe we were spoiled by A Few Good Years. Out Ceoil 12:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Ah well, if its those you want, Australia is fairly flush with them....they are some of the native people that folks do consume (was not thinking on this track at all above...) oh well... 8D (supposed to be a google-eyed figure having a ball)...I think I will go and edit something really uplifting now...Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- I was thinking of both actually Casliber; that was just a cheap joke. Have been picking mushrooms since I was 2, and lsitening to auld women calling the end of the earth for sure following the end of a bad harvest since I was 3. Ceoil 13:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
For the record JayHenry's Attorney (talk · contribs) is not me, nor is it an authorized legal agent under the employ of (I, the undersigned) Jay Henry . I have made many enemies over the years, and it's no surprise that one of them would register an account designed to get me in trouble, and then come along and make useful copy edits to an article I was just working on. My default position--which I take against any and all mischief, baffoonery, and diablerie--remains to endorse community ban against this and all ne'er-do-wells. --JayHenry (talk) 14:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Argument
Henrikgj virgin_T20 654, I brought 1907 up on the TFA talk page. We'll see what happens, before we cut each other apart. Ceoil 15:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC)