Misplaced Pages

User talk:Zhanzhao: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:32, 29 July 2008 view sourceZhanzhao (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,619 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 10:36, 29 July 2008 view source Zhanzhao (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,619 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
'''Reply to ]''' '''Reply to ]'''
Instead of asking me for proof that a movie was NOT authorized, why don't you show proof that it IS? No one in their right mind would admit that they are remaking a movie without permission. After all, these are both relatively high profile movies in their respective markets. However, it should be very easy to find at least one quote where the director/writer/marketing company of the newer movie said something about buying the rights for a remake. Instead of asking me for proof that a movie was NOT authorized, why don't you show proof that it IS? No one in their right mind would admit that they are remaking a movie without permission. After all, these are both relatively high profile movies in their respective markets. However, it should be very easy to find at least one quote where the director/writer/marketing company of the newer movie said something about buying the rights for a remake.

PS thats me on the latest undo, I forgot to log in when making that undo.

Revision as of 10:36, 29 July 2008

I'll surprise you - I did not even like the movie. First off - we can't quote reviews in the intro and can't quote them to prove a claim. A review is never subjective. Remember that before you try to show some a film in a bad light. That you quoted the review in the part where the movie is criticised is a direct evidence that you try to make it look bad and cheap. It's a violation of WO:OR and WP:POV and can get you in troubles, so please... Writing that a movie is "based on" or "a remake of" would definitely suffice. Shahid07:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Reply to User:Shshshsh Instead of asking me for proof that a movie was NOT authorized, why don't you show proof that it IS? No one in their right mind would admit that they are remaking a movie without permission. After all, these are both relatively high profile movies in their respective markets. However, it should be very easy to find at least one quote where the director/writer/marketing company of the newer movie said something about buying the rights for a remake.

PS thats me on the latest undo, I forgot to log in when making that undo.

User talk:Zhanzhao: Difference between revisions Add topic