Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:55, 8 May 2008 editGatoclass (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators104,225 edits Articles created/expanded on May 3: promote 1← Previous edit Revision as of 23:03, 8 May 2008 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,414 edits Articles created/expanded on May 4: +1Next edit →
Line 299: Line 299:


*... that in the ''']''', perpetrated in ] in 1940, 64 prisoners were shot to death, including a former prime minister, justice minister, and chief of secret police? -- self-nom by ] (]) 07:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC) *... that in the ''']''', perpetrated in ] in 1940, 64 prisoners were shot to death, including a former prime minister, justice minister, and chief of secret police? -- self-nom by ] (]) 07:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

*...that book ''']''' by ] has been a subject of significant controversy in ]? --article by ], expanded by several other editors, including myself --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 23:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


=== Articles created/expanded on May 3 === === Articles created/expanded on May 3 ===

Revision as of 23:03, 8 May 2008

For discussion of the "Did you know" section, see Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know.
Desert paintbrushDesert paintbrush

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old; for details see these rules.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main PageT:DYK
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or expanded (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles that have been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools", then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • preferably cited in the article with an inline citation.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as ] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by ]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by ] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by ]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by ] and ~~~~
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|January 19}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
] Yes No problems, ready for DYK
] Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
] Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix.
] No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

2025-01-19T12:00:00Z

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Misplaced Pages:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on May 8

Articles created/expanded on May 7

  • I apologize for sounding hostile, that was not my intention. Given the inappropriateness of the hook, and that Redmarkviolinist is an experienced editor with admin aspirations, I figured this was some kind of joke. – jaksmata 14:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Ascension Island is a notable nesting ground for Chelonia mydas.
Ascension Island is a notable nesting ground for Chelonia mydas.
{alt) ... that the ghost town of Buffalo City, North Carolina was once the largest community in Dare County? APK 03:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadden (talkcontribs) 14:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

File:Begum.jpg
  • The source (LA Times) says " liked his show". The article says "some even love his show". The hook here says he "have gain popularity amongst the religious leaders". It went from fact to deceptive exaggeration awfully quick. – jaksmata 15:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
  • I have enhanced the article again by adding another source where it says " even the country's religious leaders have appeared undisturbed, even amused ..." by Begum antics. Nevertheless, I think you are right; the above fact should go more like: ... Ali Saleem (pictured), also known as Begum Nawazish Ali, is the first ever cross-dressing Pakistani man to have gained acceptance in the conservative Islamic nation of Pakistan? - Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 17:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
(Alternatively) ... that SS-Rottenführer Heinrich Barbl helped install the piping for the gas chambers at Sobibór extermination camp? WilliamH (talk) 14:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

OR

Small Text

Articles created/expanded on May 6

or
... that in 1905 Lithuanian elites demanded that the Russian Empire create a country based on Ethnographic Lithuania, although ethnic Lithuanians were less than 30% of the proposed population? – jaksmata 15:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
  • ... that there are no LGBT rights in Pakistan and the nation is one of the few that retains the punishment of death for someone involved in acts of homosexuality? - Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 02:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Edits on May 5-6 are not even threefold expansion. This article would almost have to double in size again before it would meet minimum requirements. – jaksmata 14:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 5

  • ... that after surviving a dynamite attack in 1896, fraternity parties in the 1940s, and an earthquake in 1994, Stimson House (pictured) is now a convent for Catholic nuns? new article, self nom. Cbl62 (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
  • ... that the first movie made by Belgian film-maker Armand Denis, who became famous for his wildlife documentaries in the 1950s, was a sexually charged romantic feature filmed on location in Bali in 1928? (self-nom) Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
... or, if it fits, ..."who became famous for his wildlife documentaries made with his wife Michaela in the 1950s..."
... that Barzillai Quaife was an early advocate for Māori rights in New Zealand?
... that Barzillai Quaife has been called "Australia's first philosopher"?
... that Barzillai Quaife had an awesome name?

OK...maybe not that last one :) (self-nom) --User:AlbertHerring 21:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

  • I have a problem with this article. The first part states clearly that the authorship is uncertain, but the second part is filled with numerous references to "Milton's" doctrine. You can't have it both ways. Gatoclass (talk) 10:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • The majority of Milton scholarship and the location of the document says that Milton wrote it. There are fringe critics who try to claim that Milton didn't write it. The manuscript section explains key problems with the actual text. Fringe theory requires for a famous, but fringe, theory to be mentioned to remove POV. The fringe is mentioned at the bottom of the background. As the Modern Library edition states: "The result has been a long and varied history of erudite evasion, culminating in an effort to deny Milton's original authorship of the treatise through statistical analysis of style... Although this long-running dispute has made scholars more attentive to the history of Milton's treatise and the exact nature of his theological opinions, the effort to uncouple Milton from authorship of a work its prefatory epistle calls his 'dearest and best possession' as proven unconvincing." The sources cited all say "Milton" believed/wrote whatever was written in the work, but there are other sources that say Milton had no hand, but have not put up another author who could have written it, so there is no way to identify it as anyone but Milton, if you stay true to the cited evidence. Ottava Rima (talk) 12:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • The problem is that the article reads in a very schizophrenic way. It begins by stating that "Critics are unable to agree on the authority of the text based on its authorship, its production, and over its content." A very unequivocal statement that leads the reader into thinking the authorship is uncertain. But then you get to the second part and it says "Milton wrote this" and "Milton wrote that". It just doesn't gel. Even your comment above is somewhat schizophrenic, as you begin by saying that the belief that Milton didn't write it is only a "fringe" view but then go on to say that "other sources" say Milton had no hand. I think you need to make more clear what the situation is one way or the other, or you are just going to confuse the reader. Gatoclass (talk) 13:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Milton was blind, so he literally couldn't write the work. It is also a basis, not a full page yet. Check the updates and see if that fixes things. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
It needs more original content not in the original article, and needs more inline cites.--Bedford 02:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

OR

Shortened (by commenting out).-- Matthead  Discuß   23:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Was expanded, 3,769 bytes at the moment.-- Matthead  Discuß   11:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 4

File:Sanfedisti.jpg
  • I think you will have to change the title of this article. "Fizzle" is a word with a common dictionary meaning that is different to this particular type of "fizzle". Gatoclass (talk) 03:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Do you think the title should be Fizzle (nuclear test) ? I am open for suggestions. Everywhere I have seen the term in regards to nuclear tests was simply fizzle. I did see some dictionary references on a few websites, but they were not recent terms, and not related to this. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 03:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I think Fizzle (nuclear test) would be more appropriate. Gatoclass (talk) 04:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
What if the article begins "In addition to its common dictionary definition..." The appositive in parentheses is awkward (few readers would know to enter it). I can't imagine another encyclopedic fizzle. --Wetman (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  • See William Green for an example of how Misplaced Pages routinely uses different appositives in parentheses to distinguish different meanings of the same title. Note readers aren't expected to remember the appositive and enter it; they enter William Green and choose from a list, or enter "fizzle" and get automatically redirected to fizzle (nuclear test). The redirect would be automatically created if the article were moved. The redirect could be easily changed to a disambiguation if another encyclopedic "fizzle" article were written. As for trying to imagine such an article, good point. Art LaPella (talk) 21:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm quite aware of Wikipedian appositives, unnecessary in a case where there is but one Fizzle; were there two, an appostive in parentheses would certainly be needed. --Wetman (talk) 23:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I went ahead and moved it. I'm not sure if we will have other meaninings as they would be more "dictionary terms". JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 23:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  • ... that Matilda Sissieretta Joyner Jones (pictured) was the first African-American to sing at Carnegie Hall? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by — ] (] · ]) 09:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
    • (Technically, I've only expanded it by a factor of 4.4. If that's not sufficient, I'll make it longer.)
Added a link to an example monument that is new. Would it un-PC to suggest this one for Cinco de Mayo?--Bedford 23:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Sources can't agree on whether or not it was after Mexico or Cuba, so use a term that can mean either.--Bedford 00:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 3

A Buckeye chicken
A Buckeye chicken
Bouclé in the process of being spun
Bouclé in the process of being spun
Any suggestions for rewording?--Bedford 05:44, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, its the togated portrait bust alone that recalls neoclassical portrait bust conventions of the early 19th century. (The pedestal base is generically Neo-Grec, but that styl;e designation would confuse the reader.) --Wetman (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
So modified.--Bedford 07:46, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
legendary? POV+PEACOCK? --74.13.126.11 (talk) 04:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Fixed. Milk’s Favorite Cookie 13:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues The content in the article isn't new, it's cut and pasted from each coach's specific article. When you compile an article like that, please mention it in your edit summary, because it's a gfdl violation otherwise. - Bobet 11:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • ... that 1,036,628 visitors arrived in Kenya in 2000 and tourism receipts totaled $257 million? I really can't believe this article was created before. Editorofthewiki 00:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Over half the content is pasting from the various National Park articles. Circeus (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
      • I have significantly expanded it beyond what is pasted from National Park Articles. Please give it another try. I pasted some of the information from Tourism in Botswana and it got DYKed. Editorofthewiki 10:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
        • I gave it a go, but when I look at the cites, they don't appear to support the facts they are citing. Gatoclass (talk) 10:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
          • They do; a lot are in book sources. Do you have any specific objections that I can fix e.g. the specific cites? Editorofthewiki 10:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
            • For example, you have multiple statements that "a total of 130,585 tourists arrived in Kenya compared to over 273,000 that year", that "Tourist income from China, however, dropped 10.7%, compared with over 50% from traditonal revenue earners the United States and Euroupe. Domestic tourism also improved by 45%, earning the tourist sector 3.65 billion shillings out of the 8.08 billion in the period being reviewed."
"Conferance tourism was badly hit during the first quarter, dropping by 87.4% compared to the growth that was witnessed in 2007. 974 people arrived in Kenya duringb that period for many conferrances were cancelled. Business travel declined by 21 per cent during the time period and 35,914 travellers came into the country compared to 45,338 during the same period the year before." - All these cited to reference 5, but here is ref. 5 and I'm darned if I can see any of these facts in this reference! Gatoclass (talk) 09:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
File:Mrs quezon1.jpg
The IMdB is not acceptable as a source for this sort of material. Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
links 1 and 2, referenced in the page also supports the same info. GDibyendu (talk) 16:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Google books result from 'Encyclopedia of Hindi Cinema' shows that Hindi version of this movie was 1st Hindi film to use playback singing. But, this book is on Hindi Cinema and not Indian Cinema in general, probably that's why it did not mention that the Bengali version was 1st Indian film to introduce this. GDibyendu (talk) 16:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on May 2

Sorry - fixed. Milk’s Favorite Cookie 01:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Cited source has no mention of the hook's fact. - Bobet 11:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
The Rose Bowl under construction
The Rose Bowl under construction
strikethrough and updated Group29 (talk) 01:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Article still doesn't have a cited source for this fact. Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length verified, although I tagged it with {{sections}} because as is it's not easy on the eyes. Second, I can't find a source for "best remembered" other than the little note in the inofbox. I'd really prefer this judgement come from an external reliable source. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

See also

Category:
Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions Add topic