Misplaced Pages

:Call a spade a spade: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:29, 3 May 2008 editShoemaker's Holiday (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,613 edits The previous writing was rather overloaded with advocation of timidity. This phrasing makes the same points in a more positive manner.← Previous edit Revision as of 23:30, 3 May 2008 edit undoShoemaker's Holiday (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,613 edits The Jack Kennedy test: Put quote in contextNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
] ]
== The Jack Kennedy test == == The Jack Kennedy test ==
This negative version of this line of thinking is sometimes referred to as "Jack Kennedy test" after the ] quote: "]". This negative version of this line of thinking is sometimes referred to as "Jack Kennedy test" after the ] quote: "Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy: I knew Jack Kennedy; Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. ]".


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 23:30, 3 May 2008

Essay on editing Misplaced Pages
This is an essay.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
Shortcuts
This page in a nutshell: It's okay to call a spade a spade — to speak plainly — but remember to remain civil, and to stay focused on improving the encyclopedia.
"What do you expect of me? I've always been one to call a spade a spade."

"Fine," said Yevgenia. "But don't imagine that's always a virtue."

Vasily Grossman, Life and Fate

Users too often cite policies, like our policy against personal attacks and our policy against incivility, not to protect themselves from personal attacks, but rather to protect their edits from review.

Although editors who consistently engage in disruptive editing are disruptive editors, and editors who consistently vandalize are vandals, there is still a requirement for editors to be reasonably civil to each other. It is, of course, necessary, at some point, to let editors know what they're doing wrong so that they have a chance to change, but a bit of politeness while doing so will get them to listen more readily. One can be honest and direct about another editor's behavior without resorting to name-calling or attacks. Discuss problematic edits, in reasonable terms, on that article's discussion page. If the behavior of a user remains problematic, use the dispute resolution process.

It's not a "manual geomorphological modification implement"

The Jack Kennedy test

This negative version of this line of thinking is sometimes referred to as "Jack Kennedy test" after the Lloyd Bentsen quote: "Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy: I knew Jack Kennedy; Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy".

See also

Category:
Misplaced Pages:Call a spade a spade: Difference between revisions Add topic