| Revision as of 02:05, 1 March 2008 editAltenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers219,766 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:21, 1 March 2008 edit undoKaiba (talk | contribs)12,047 edits poonNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| I have nothing to say to you beyond my ] (optionally extended into ]), so your post here will most probably be reverted without reading. If you came here to teach or bait me, this is a proof that and I am right. `']] 03:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | I have nothing to say to you beyond my ] (optionally extended into ]), so your post here will most probably be reverted without reading. If you came here to teach or bait me, this is a proof that and I am right. `']] 03:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| I don't give a crap if you revert this, but unprotect ]. One isolated case of of a user adding something strange (not even vandalism, for crips sake) doesn't warrent the protection, much less for the extended period of protection you gave it. — ] ] 04:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:21, 1 March 2008
Solemn pledge of muteness
Since wikipedia is full of sickos happy to jump to conclusions, and since the adminship is infested with trigger-happy cowboys and wikilawyers, I hereby pledge to not engage in any communication in wikipedia whatsoever.
Signed and dated: `'Míkka>t 19:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- P.S. And no I will never stop beating my wife. `'Míkka>t 19:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- P.P.S. "Normal service" will be resumed when mechanisms will be established to disperse the poisonous atmosphere of witch hunting, militant paranoia, kangaroo courts, and wikilawyering in wikipedia. My pledge did not change my overall respect to the project. I simply no longer want to endanger my editing activities by trigger-happy idiots endorsed by polite formalists. `'Míkka>t 20:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
I have nothing to say to you beyond my edit summary (optionally extended into article talk page), so your post here will most probably be reverted without reading. If you came here to teach or bait me, this is a proof that you are a jerk and I am right. `'Míkka>t 03:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Poon
I don't give a crap if you revert this, but unprotect Poon. One isolated case of of a user adding something strange (not even vandalism, for crips sake) doesn't warrent the protection, much less for the extended period of protection you gave it. — Save_Us † 04:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)