Misplaced Pages

User talk:Seraphimblade: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:40, 6 February 2008 editRalbot (talk | contribs)57,708 edits Signpost delivery using AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 23:38, 6 February 2008 edit undoCoppertwig (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,272 edits An apology, and a request for advice.: new sectionNext edit →
Line 177: Line 177:


<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] (]) 08:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)</small> <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] (]) 08:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)</small>

== An apology, and a request for advice. ==

I would appreciate it if you would give me and ] some advice. (One reason I thought of asking you is that I saw your name at ].) We're soon going to be inviting discussion of ] of many ] templates. The question we're pondering is: where to suggest that the discussion take place. Dividing it up among many template talk pages seems unwieldy since there are so many, yet having the discussion of all of them on one page could make the page overcrowded. We're thinking of setting up about 4 pages for the discussion (e.g. one for the General templates, one for Articles, etc.) either in my user space or as subpages of ]. Would you please let us know what you think about where to suggest that the discussion be?

In case you're interested in any background, discussion of where to have the discussion has been ]. Previous related discussion has been ], e.g. , and ].

I realized recently that I don't think I ever apologized properly or explained completely about something almost a year ago that you may have forgotten about or may not even have noticed at the time anyway. But here goes: I'm sorry that I seemed to imply that you weren't a "non-involved admin" in my at a ]. I knew very well that you were an admin, but seem to have missed registering the existence of your post (or who it was from) when I first read the thread, apparently because I was flustered at the time. As I to you later, I later couldn't believe that the time stamp on your post came before mine. At no time did I intend to imply that you weren't a "non-involved admin". I'm sorry I didn't clarify that in that thread before it was archived, and that it took me this long to apologize properly. --] (]) 23:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:38, 6 February 2008

This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Seraphimblade.
Archive
Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Please do be nice.

Please read before posting!

I don't always post a full rationale for everything I do, since doing this would take an inordinate amount of time. I do always have one, though, and will be happy to tell you why I did anything if you ask.

PLEASE READ HERE FIRST before asking deletion-related questions.

If you haven't posted a comment already, please put it under a new section at the bottom of the page using markup:


==Section header==
Your comment ~~~~

or click here.

If you have, please post it under the section you started. Responses will be made on your talk page unless you request otherwise.

This page will be archived regularly, generally by an automated process, but that doesn't mean I consider the discussion closed if you have more to say. If your old comments are archived please start a new section on this page for further comment. Please remember to sign your comments using ~~~~.

If I contacted you on your talk page, I'll keep it on watch. Please feel free to reply either there or on this page, whichever's easier for you.

Please refrain from personal attacks. Personal attacks made against me made on this page will be left on it, but this in no way indicates that I approve of them or will not report them if they are severe or continuous. Personal attacks against other editors will be removed or reverted.

Issaquah Middle School follow-up

Since you "urged" me to find independent sources stating the notability of Issaquah Middle School, I searched for more information on the school and the sources and information derived is as followed:

http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/schoolguide/profile.php?results=&building_id=3038&search= Statistics on the school compared to other schools in the region from the city paper The Seattle Times

http://www.metrokc.gov/dnrp/swd/greenschools/issaquah-school-district.asp King County website stating the improvments to the enviromental-friendly changes schools in the Issaquah School District which include Issaquah Middle School.

Thank you and I hope you reconsider your decision to delete the webpage.

Thanks for participating in my RfA!

Thanks for participating in my RfA!
Although it failed 43/27/0, I'm happy because the outcome has been very helpful in many meaningful ways. Moreover you alerted me to your understandable concerns about sourcing. I will take heed and carefully address them. All the best, Gwen Gale (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

No need to bother!

Deleting the images. They are mine. My copyright. My permission. Where else would they be used but in Misplaced Pages, another Wiki, or Wikias, anyway? Clarity has been established.

Furthermore, while this is not directed at you in particular, or anyone in particular, I never upload a free-use image without having a professional hex it first. Please be so good as to spread the word around: "Unless it's a fair-use image or file, just try deleting a free-use image uploaded by User:Wilhelmina Will; see what happens." I'm not out to hurt anyone, just to protect my files.

Thank you for notifying me that they needed clarification, at any rate. Wouldn't want others confused. Cheers! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Well What I mean is I want them to be used as much as pleases everyone, but until the last of them (in line) I didn't think to upload them to Wikimedia Commons. If you'd rather, I could upload them there and then you can delete the files that only exist on Misplaced Pages, but please wait till they've been uploaded to the Commons!
Off the topic; you don't believe in hexes? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 05:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 5 28 January 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you.... you have just totally changed my mood : ) I wasnt sure that it would be anything like this.... Talk you for the help i will use that page i was keeping it because they reply together about what they are doing to me and then say something sifferent on the open pages anyhow, you dont want to her that... Thank you for being kind : ) kate 100%freehuman (talk) 12:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 6 4 February 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

An apology, and a request for advice.

I would appreciate it if you would give me and Moonriddengirl some advice. (One reason I thought of asking you is that I saw your name at Misplaced Pages talk:CSD.) We're soon going to be inviting discussion of proposed new wording of many CSD templates. The question we're pondering is: where to suggest that the discussion take place. Dividing it up among many template talk pages seems unwieldy since there are so many, yet having the discussion of all of them on one page could make the page overcrowded. We're thinking of setting up about 4 pages for the discussion (e.g. one for the General templates, one for Articles, etc.) either in my user space or as subpages of Misplaced Pages talk:CSD. Would you please let us know what you think about where to suggest that the discussion be?

In case you're interested in any background, discussion of where to have the discussion has been here on my talk page. Previous related discussion has been at Wt:CSD, e.g. my last post there on the topic, and at Moonriddengirl's talk page.

I realized recently that I don't think I ever apologized properly or explained completely about something almost a year ago that you may have forgotten about or may not even have noticed at the time anyway. But here goes: I'm sorry that I seemed to imply that you weren't a "non-involved admin" in my post at a report to AN/I. I knew very well that you were an admin, but seem to have missed registering the existence of your post (or who it was from) when I first read the thread, apparently because I was flustered at the time. As I explained to you later, I later couldn't believe that the time stamp on your post came before mine. At no time did I intend to imply that you weren't a "non-involved admin". I'm sorry I didn't clarify that in that thread before it was archived, and that it took me this long to apologize properly. --Coppertwig (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Seraphimblade: Difference between revisions Add topic