| Revision as of 15:45, 29 August 2007 editRocksanddirt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,954 edits →Interesting note: c← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:58, 29 August 2007 edit undoSander Säde (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,757 edits →Interesting note: ?Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ::], exactly my thoughts. I expected that the accusers in this case present their evidence first... But for some reason this has not happened.--] 04:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC) | ::], exactly my thoughts. I expected that the accusers in this case present their evidence first... But for some reason this has not happened.--] 04:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::Well, I could see some motions being first as the actual scope of this is not well defined (to me at least), but everyone has also had several days at least to prepare the evidence statement for when the arb was opened. See the Seven of Diamonds one, within just a few hours of opening there were two very long evidence presentations, buy two involved parties. --] 15:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC) | :::Well, I could see some motions being first as the actual scope of this is not well defined (to me at least), but everyone has also had several days at least to prepare the evidence statement for when the arb was opened. See the Seven of Diamonds one, within just a few hours of opening there were two very long evidence presentations, buy two involved parties. --] 15:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I suspect that the initiator of the case has not presented evidence, because he sees an "ArbCom axe" above the heads of Estonian editors more useful then presenting his rather meager evidence. He seems to have plenty of time for other activities on Misplaced Pages so it is getting harder and harder for me to ]. ] 15:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:58, 29 August 2007
Interesting note
I found it a bit interesting that there are several motions, and some vigorous discussion of them, but no evidence yet. --Rocksanddirt 20:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- What's the hurry? The editing pattern of Korps! Estonia is well demonstrated on this very page. Take a look at the thread "politely" titled "Smear emanating from FayssalF". Fayssal, you've got my sympathy for having to face what looks like ganging up on you. It is tedious and annoying to repeat your arguments each time a new look-alike account pops up on this page. The pattern is familiar: first there are aggressive accusations from Alexia and Digwuren, then the same from Suva and E.J., then you may expect Staberinde and Martintg to chime in, then, when you think it's over, the same accusations will be repeated by Sander Säde and DLX, etc, etc. This is what I had to go through on WP:ANI on a daily basis. And that's what my grievances are about. Wikipedians are not supposed to be ganged up on. Nobody likes to be witchhunted. This manner of editing results in nothing but stress and frustration on the part of everyone involved. --Ghirla 23:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ghirla, put your evidence where your mouth is. Demeaning generalizing is just your thing and the bigest grievance I have with you.--Alexia Death the Grey 04:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Rocksanddirt, exactly my thoughts. I expected that the accusers in this case present their evidence first... But for some reason this has not happened.--Alexia Death the Grey 04:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I could see some motions being first as the actual scope of this is not well defined (to me at least), but everyone has also had several days at least to prepare the evidence statement for when the arb was opened. See the Seven of Diamonds one, within just a few hours of opening there were two very long evidence presentations, buy two involved parties. --Rocksanddirt 15:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- I suspect that the initiator of the case has not presented evidence, because he sees an "ArbCom axe" above the heads of Estonian editors more useful then presenting his rather meager evidence. He seems to have plenty of time for other activities on Misplaced Pages so it is getting harder and harder for me to AGF. Sander Säde 15:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I could see some motions being first as the actual scope of this is not well defined (to me at least), but everyone has also had several days at least to prepare the evidence statement for when the arb was opened. See the Seven of Diamonds one, within just a few hours of opening there were two very long evidence presentations, buy two involved parties. --Rocksanddirt 15:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)