| Revision as of 05:34, 8 August 2007 editTalkAbout (talk | contribs)2,020 edits :-( I think I am coming to the same conclusion....← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:27, 12 August 2007 edit undoSerialVerb (talk | contribs)153 edits ThanksNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :Me too, see ]. It is abundantly clear that Misplaced Pages is used routinely for advertising and spamming. Many articles are very biased indeed, and trying to fix that is a complete waste of time because well-meant efforts will be reverted immediately by the nuts and spammers. ] 20:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | :Me too, see ]. It is abundantly clear that Misplaced Pages is used routinely for advertising and spamming. Many articles are very biased indeed, and trying to fix that is a complete waste of time because well-meant efforts will be reverted immediately by the nuts and spammers. ] 20:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::I am beginning to agree as I came back to find the Brahma Kumaris article in a state of continual pruning, chop, chop, chop till all that remains will be an advert. They are even agreeing on using primary sources for their benefit.:-(PEACE] 05:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | ::I am beginning to agree as I came back to find the Brahma Kumaris article in a state of continual pruning, chop, chop, chop till all that remains will be an advert. They are even agreeing on using primary sources for their benefit.:-(PEACE] 05:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Thank you for your information and guidance re: the Cult trauma article. ] 14:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 14:27, 12 August 2007
I lost faith in Misplaced Pages. I welcome attempts outside the Misplaced Pages article name space to expose it as a forum masquerading as an encyclopedia.
- Me too, see Bishop Alfred. It is abundantly clear that Misplaced Pages is used routinely for advertising and spamming. Many articles are very biased indeed, and trying to fix that is a complete waste of time because well-meant efforts will be reverted immediately by the nuts and spammers. JdH 20:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I am beginning to agree as I came back to find the Brahma Kumaris article in a state of continual pruning, chop, chop, chop till all that remains will be an advert. They are even agreeing on using primary sources for their benefit.:-(PEACETalkAbout 05:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your information and guidance re: the Cult trauma article. SV 14:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Categories: