| Revision as of 11:30, 30 June 2007 editDarrenhusted (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,047 editsm →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:05, 2 July 2007 edit undoDannycali (talk | contribs)645 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :'''Comment''' in the nature of pro wrestler, some of the "loser" wrestlers can be as notable and important as midcard ones. Just because you think he is a "jobber" doesn't mean it should be deleted. ] 03:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | :'''Comment''' in the nature of pro wrestler, some of the "loser" wrestlers can be as notable and important as midcard ones. Just because you think he is a "jobber" doesn't mean it should be deleted. ] 03:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :...and it's not a reason to keep him. ] 11:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | :...and it's not a reason to keep him. ] 11:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::...and you are a jerk and idiot. ] 02:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Keep''' For reasons given by dannycali. Should Barry Horowitz not have an article just because he was a jobber? ] 04:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' For reasons given by dannycali. Should Barry Horowitz not have an article just because he was a jobber? ] 04:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''', no. I know who Barry Horowitz is, but I have never heard of Jake Milliman. ] 12:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | *'''Comment''', no. I know who Barry Horowitz is, but I have never heard of Jake Milliman. ] 12:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:05, 2 July 2007
Jake Milliman
- Jake Milliman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
PROD removed, non-notable wrestler, fails WP:V, WP:A and WP:BLP. Darrenhusted 00:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom and my original vote. Nikki311 00:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, wrestled as a jobber, won no titles, and the article has no sources. Nenog 03:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete not a notable wrestler and no sources. OysterGuitarst 04:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —John Vandenberg 09:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Very notable wrestler for AWA in the 1980s and 1990. He won a ton of important matches and was a big part of the AWA. He won the Team Challenge Series battle royal, he beat Col. Debeers in the "Turkey on a pole match" and was a phenomenal wrestler. Needs an article. Dannycali 00:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment, he does not "need" and article. His notability is questionable, try establishing it. Darrenhusted 12:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, wikipedia is not a place for articles on jobbers. MPJ-DK 11:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment in the nature of pro wrestler, some of the "loser" wrestlers can be as notable and important as midcard ones. Just because you think he is a "jobber" doesn't mean it should be deleted. Dannycali 03:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- ...and it's not a reason to keep him. Darrenhusted 11:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- ...and you are a jerk and idiot. Dannycali 02:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep For reasons given by dannycali. Should Barry Horowitz not have an article just because he was a jobber? DanZero 04:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment, no. I know who Barry Horowitz is, but I have never heard of Jake Milliman. Darrenhusted 12:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)